From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fat: convert to unlocked_ioctl
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 21:55:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201005052155.17249.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wrvitd5c.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
FAT does not require the BKL in its ioctl function, which is already serialized
through a mutex. Since we're already touching the ioctl code, also fix the
missing handling of FAT_IOCTL_GET_ATTRIBUTES in the compat code.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
On Wednesday 05 May 2010 20:30:07 OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com> writes:
> > That's probably not a good idea, without a little bit more analysis,
> > otherwise it's quite easy to introduce subtle bugs.
The chances are rather low if the maintainer confirms that the BKL
is not needed. I double-checked and found a small bug in related
code, so this does both.
> What analysis? Who do it? I thought about removing BKL of FAT from
> several years ago. I was reviewing FAT multiple times, and I'm always
> testing FAT without BKL.
>
> If you are going to do, could you do it instead of this patch?
The only thing the series really needs to do is to remove the
usage of the deprecated ->ioctl() operation. This patch makes
FAT simply use unlocked_ioctl but does not reintroduce the
BKL.
Does that look better?
fs/fat/dir.c | 11 ++++++-----
fs/fat/fat.h | 4 ++--
fs/fat/file.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fat/dir.c b/fs/fat/dir.c
index 530b4ca..d9bf865 100644
--- a/fs/fat/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fat/dir.c
@@ -758,9 +758,10 @@ static int fat_ioctl_readdir(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
return ret;
}
-static int fat_dir_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
- unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
+static long fat_dir_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
+ unsigned long arg)
{
+ struct inode *inode = filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
struct __fat_dirent __user *d1 = (struct __fat_dirent __user *)arg;
int short_only, both;
@@ -774,7 +775,7 @@ static int fat_dir_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
both = 1;
break;
default:
- return fat_generic_ioctl(inode, filp, cmd, arg);
+ return fat_generic_ioctl(filp, cmd, arg);
}
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, d1, sizeof(struct __fat_dirent[2])))
@@ -814,7 +815,7 @@ static long fat_compat_dir_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned cmd,
both = 1;
break;
default:
- return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
+ return fat_generic_ioctl(filp, cmd, (unsigned long)arg);
}
if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, d1, sizeof(struct compat_dirent[2])))
@@ -836,7 +837,7 @@ const struct file_operations fat_dir_operations = {
.llseek = generic_file_llseek,
.read = generic_read_dir,
.readdir = fat_readdir,
- .ioctl = fat_dir_ioctl,
+ .unlocked_ioctl = fat_dir_ioctl,
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
.compat_ioctl = fat_compat_dir_ioctl,
#endif
diff --git a/fs/fat/fat.h b/fs/fat/fat.h
index e6efdfa..eb821ee 100644
--- a/fs/fat/fat.h
+++ b/fs/fat/fat.h
@@ -298,8 +298,8 @@ extern int fat_free_clusters(struct inode *inode, int cluster);
extern int fat_count_free_clusters(struct super_block *sb);
/* fat/file.c */
-extern int fat_generic_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
- unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg);
+extern long fat_generic_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
+ unsigned long arg);
extern const struct file_operations fat_file_operations;
extern const struct inode_operations fat_file_inode_operations;
extern int fat_setattr(struct dentry * dentry, struct iattr * attr);
diff --git a/fs/fat/file.c b/fs/fat/file.c
index e8c159d..a14c2f6 100644
--- a/fs/fat/file.c
+++ b/fs/fat/file.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/compat.h>
#include <linux/mount.h>
#include <linux/time.h>
#include <linux/buffer_head.h>
@@ -114,9 +115,9 @@ out:
return err;
}
-int fat_generic_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
- unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
+long fat_generic_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
{
+ struct inode *inode = filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode;
u32 __user *user_attr = (u32 __user *)arg;
switch (cmd) {
@@ -129,6 +130,15 @@ int fat_generic_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
}
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+static long fat_generic_compat_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
+ unsigned long arg)
+
+{
+ return fat_generic_ioctl(filp, cmd, (unsigned long)compat_ptr(arg));
+}
+#endif
+
static int fat_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
{
if ((filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE) &&
@@ -159,7 +169,10 @@ const struct file_operations fat_file_operations = {
.aio_write = generic_file_aio_write,
.mmap = generic_file_mmap,
.release = fat_file_release,
- .ioctl = fat_generic_ioctl,
+ .unlocked_ioctl = fat_generic_ioctl,
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+ .compat_ioctl = fat_generic_compat_ioctl,
+#endif
.fsync = fat_file_fsync,
.splice_read = generic_file_splice_read,
};
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-05 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-05 13:15 [PATCH 0/6] BKL ioctl pushdown John Kacur
2010-05-05 13:15 ` [PATCH 1/6] coda: " John Kacur
2010-05-17 2:10 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-05 13:15 ` [PATCH 2/6] coda: Clean-up whitespace problems in pioctl.c John Kacur
2010-05-17 2:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-05 13:15 ` [PATCH 3/6] fat: BKL ioctl pushdown John Kacur
2010-05-05 16:04 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-05-05 17:34 ` John Kacur
2010-05-05 18:30 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-05-05 19:55 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2010-05-05 21:06 ` [PATCH] fat: convert to unlocked_ioctl OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-05-05 20:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] fat: BKL ioctl pushdown John Kacur
2010-05-05 13:15 ` [PATCH 4/6] ncpfs: " John Kacur
2010-05-17 2:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-05 13:15 ` [PATCH 5/6] smbfs: " John Kacur
2010-05-17 2:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-17 2:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-17 11:46 ` John Kacur
2010-05-05 13:15 ` [PATCH 6/6] udf: " John Kacur
2010-05-05 14:39 ` Jan Kara
2010-05-11 7:08 ` [PATCH 0/6] " Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201005052155.17249.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox