From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, josh@joshtriplett.org,
dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/48] rcu: optionally leave lockdep enabled after RCU lockdep splat
Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 18:46:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100505224641.GA15359@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273004398-19760-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* Paul E. McKenney (paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
>
> There is no need to disable lockdep after an RCU lockdep splat,
> so remove the debug_lockdeps_off() from lockdep_rcu_dereference().
> To avoid repeated lockdep splats, use a static variable in the inlined
> rcu_dereference_check() and rcu_dereference_protected() macros so that
> a given instance splats only once, but so that multiple instances can
> be detected per boot.
>
> This is controlled by a new config variable CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY,
> which is disabled by default. This provides the normal lockdep behavior
> by default, but permits people who want to find multiple RCU-lockdep
> splats per boot to easily do so.
I'll play the devil's advocate here. (just because that's so much fun)
;-)
If we look at:
include/linux/debug_locks.h:
static inline int __debug_locks_off(void)
{
return xchg(&debug_locks, 0);
}
We see that all code following a call to "debug_locks_off()" can assume
that it cannot possibly run concurrently with other code following
"debug_locks_off()". Now, I'm not saying that the code we currently have
will necessarily break, but I think it is worth asking if there is any
assumption in lockdep (or RCU lockdep more specifically) about mutual
exclusion after debug_locks_off() ?
Because if there is, then this patch is definitely breaking something by
not protecting lockdep against multiple concurrent executions.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Requested-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Tested-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/rcupdate.h | 6 ++----
> kernel/lockdep.c | 2 ++
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 12 ++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index a8b2e03..4dca275 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -230,8 +230,7 @@ extern int rcu_my_thread_group_empty(void);
> */
> #define rcu_dereference_check(p, c) \
> ({ \
> - if (debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && !(c)) \
> - lockdep_rcu_dereference(__FILE__, __LINE__); \
> + __do_rcu_dereference_check(c); \
> rcu_dereference_raw(p); \
> })
>
> @@ -248,8 +247,7 @@ extern int rcu_my_thread_group_empty(void);
> */
> #define rcu_dereference_protected(p, c) \
> ({ \
> - if (debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && !(c)) \
> - lockdep_rcu_dereference(__FILE__, __LINE__); \
> + __do_rcu_dereference_check(c); \
> (p); \
> })
>
> diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
> index 2594e1c..73747b7 100644
> --- a/kernel/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
> @@ -3801,8 +3801,10 @@ void lockdep_rcu_dereference(const char *file, const int line)
> {
> struct task_struct *curr = current;
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY
> if (!debug_locks_off())
> return;
> +#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY */
> printk("\n===================================================\n");
> printk( "[ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]\n");
> printk( "---------------------------------------------------\n");
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 935248b..94090b4 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -512,6 +512,18 @@ config PROVE_RCU
>
> Say N if you are unsure.
>
> +config PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY
> + bool "RCU debugging: don't disable PROVE_RCU on first splat"
> + depends on PROVE_RCU
> + default n
> + help
> + By itself, PROVE_RCU will disable checking upon issuing the
> + first warning (or "splat"). This feature prevents such
> + disabling, allowing multiple RCU-lockdep warnings to be printed
> + on a single reboot.
> +
> + Say N if you are unsure.
> +
> config LOCKDEP
> bool
> depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT && LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
> --
> 1.7.0
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-05 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-04 20:19 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/48] v4 patches queued for 2.6.35 Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/48] rcu: optionally leave lockdep enabled after RCU lockdep splat Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-05 22:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2010-05-05 23:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-05 23:24 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-05 23:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-06 2:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-05-06 23:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/48] rcu: substitute set_need_resched for sending resched IPIs Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/48] rcu: make dead code really dead Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/48] rcu: move some code from macro to function Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/48] rcu: ignore offline CPUs in last non-dyntick-idle CPU check Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/48] rcu: Fix bogus CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING in comments to reflect reality Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/48] rcu: fix now-bogus rcu_scheduler_active comments Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/48] rcu: shrink rcutiny by making synchronize_rcu_bh() be inline Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/48] rcu: rename rcutiny rcu_ctrlblk to rcu_sched_ctrlblk Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/48] rcu: refactor RCU's context-switch handling Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/48] rcu: slim down rcutiny by removing rcu_scheduler_active and friends Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/48] rcu: enable CPU_STALL_VERBOSE by default Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/48] rcu: disable CPU stall warnings upon panic Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/48] rcu: print boot-time console messages if RCU configs out of ordinary Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/48] rcu: improve RCU CPU stall-warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/48] rcu: permit discontiguous cpu_possible_mask CPU numbering Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/48] rcu: v2: reduce the number of spurious RCU_SOFTIRQ invocations Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/48] rcu: improve the RCU CPU-stall warning documentation Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/48] Debugobjects transition check Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/48] rcu head introduce rcu head init on stack Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/48] remove all rcu head initializations, except on_stack initializations Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:27 ` Matt Mackall
2010-05-04 20:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 23:44 ` James Morris
2010-05-05 0:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/48] rcu head remove init Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/48] tree/tiny rcu: Add debug RCU head objects (v5) Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 24/48] rcu: make SRCU usable in modules Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 25/48] rcu: fix debugobjects rcu head init on stack in rcutree_plugin.h Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 26/48] rcu: RCU_FAST_NO_HZ must check RCU dyntick state Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 27/48] vfs: add fs.h to define struct file Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 28/48] net: Make accesses to ->br_port safe for sparse RCU Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 21:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-05-04 21:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-05 22:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-06 14:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-06 23:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 29/48] rcu: add an rcu_dereference_index_check() Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 30/48] mce: convert to rcu_dereference_index_check() Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 31/48] rcu: define __rcu address space modifier for sparse Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-04 23:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 32/48] rculist: avoid __rcu annotations Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 33/48] cgroups: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:48 ` Paul Menage
2010-05-05 0:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 34/48] credentials: rcu annotation Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 35/48] keys: __rcu annotations Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 36/48] nfs: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-05 10:14 ` David Howells
2010-05-05 12:44 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-05-05 21:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 37/48] net: __rcu annotations for drivers Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 38/48] perf_event: __rcu annotations Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 39/48] notifiers: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 40/48] radix-tree: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 41/48] idr: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 42/48] input: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 43/48] vhost: add " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 21:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-04 23:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 23:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-05 0:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 44/48] net/netfilter: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 45/48] kvm: add " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 46/48] kernel: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 47/48] net: " Paul E. McKenney
2010-05-04 20:19 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 48/48] kvm: more " Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100505224641.GA15359@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox