From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753209Ab0EFGyM (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 02:54:12 -0400 Received: from 0122700014.0.fullrate.dk ([95.166.99.235]:58299 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751059Ab0EFGyL (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 May 2010 02:54:11 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 08:54:09 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Ingo Molnar Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Additional RCU fixes for 2.6.34 Message-ID: <20100506065409.GQ27497@kernel.dk> References: <20100506002838.GA31818@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100506062250.GC1172@elte.hu> <20100506062552.GN27497@kernel.dk> <20100506063948.GG1172@elte.hu> <20100506064336.GP27497@kernel.dk> <20100506064959.GJ1172@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100506064959.GJ1172@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 06 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Thu, May 06 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Jens Axboe wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, May 06 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > > > > * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, Ingo, > > > > > > > > > > > > Here are three more RCU-lockdep fixes for 2.6.34: > > > > > > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-2.6-rcu.git rcu/urgent > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanx, Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------> > > > > > > Vivek Goyal (1) > > > > > > blk-cgroup: Fix RCU correctness warning in cfq_init_queue() > > > > > > > > > > > > Paul E. McKenney (2) > > > > > > vfs: fix RCU-lockdep false positive due to /proc access > > > > > > memcg: css_id() must be called under rcu_read_lock() > > > > > > > > > > > > block/cfq-iosched.c | 2 ++ > > > > > > include/linux/fdtable.h | 3 ++- > > > > > > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 11 +++++++++++ > > > > > > kernel/rcupdate.c | 11 +++++++++++ > > > > > > mm/memcontrol.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- > > > > > > 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > Pulled, thanks Paul! > > > > > > > > > > Jens, is that blk-cgroup fix from Vivek fine to you via this route? > > > > > > > > Sure, I did think it was a bit odd to funnel it through that route, but it's > > > > no big deal. > > > > > > I havent pushed the tree out yet, wanted to wait for your feedback before > > > doing anything permanent. You can still apply it to the block tree. > > > > > > You were Cc:-ed 3 days ago to this patch, when RCU fixes got posted. These are > > > basically the leftover PROVE_RCU fix patches that didnt get picked up by > > > subsystem trees. > > > > Yes I read it then, and Paul said he'd applied it. So I didn't touch it, it > > was trivial enough that the path to the kernel wasn't that big of a problem. > > And it didn't cause me any merge issues, so no harm done. > > > > I can easily pull it in since I have a fix or two for .34 left yet, but if > > you already have it stashed and ready to submit, lets just leave it there. > > Yeah, please apply it to the block tree (i have just zapped it from my local > tree), we really want subsystem patches to go via their respective trees. I've > attached the latest patch below. > > Thanks! Done! -- Jens Axboe