From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Helmut Schaa <Helmut.Schaa@gmx.de>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the suspend tree
Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 04:13:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201005080413.24465.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100507130821.3fb72c9d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Friday 07 May 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> After merging the suspend tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/mac80211/scan.c: In function 'ieee80211_scan_state_decision':
> net/mac80211/scan.c:510: error: implicit declaration of function 'pm_qos_requirement'
>
> Caused by commit 62bad14fc6e0911a99882c261390968977d43283 ("PM QOS
> update") from the suspend tree interacting with commit
> df13cce53a7b28a81460e6bfc4857e9df4956141 ("mac80211: Improve software
> scan timing") from the net tree.
>
> I have added the following merge fixup patch and can carry it as
> necessary:
Thanks a lot, please do so if that's not a problem.
Both trees are based on Linus' current and I don't see a good way of fixing
this issue in any of them individually.
Rafael
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 13:02:54 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] wireless: update for pm_qos_requirement to pm_qos_request rename
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> net/mac80211/scan.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/scan.c b/net/mac80211/scan.c
> index e14c441..e1b0be7 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/scan.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/scan.c
> @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ static int ieee80211_scan_state_decision(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> bad_latency = time_after(jiffies +
> ieee80211_scan_get_channel_time(next_chan),
> local->leave_oper_channel_time +
> - usecs_to_jiffies(pm_qos_requirement(PM_QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY)));
> + usecs_to_jiffies(pm_qos_request(PM_QOS_NETWORK_LATENCY)));
>
> listen_int_exceeded = time_after(jiffies +
> ieee80211_scan_get_channel_time(next_chan),
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-08 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-07 3:08 linux-next: build failure after merge of the suspend tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-08 2:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-05-21 0:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-21 5:46 ` David Miller
2010-05-21 5:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-05-21 5:56 ` David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-31 4:07 Stephen Rothwell
2011-01-31 10:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-05 2:11 Stephen Rothwell
2011-05-05 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201005080413.24465.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=Helmut.Schaa@gmx.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).