From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752259Ab0EHOcS (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 May 2010 10:32:18 -0400 Received: from relay01.mx.bawue.net ([193.7.176.67]:48613 "EHLO relay01.mx.bawue.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751328Ab0EHOcR (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 May 2010 10:32:17 -0400 Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 16:32:13 +0200 From: Nils Radtke To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: "Jan Evert van Grootheest (SDG)" , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference, i915_gem_object_move_to_active Message-ID: <20100508143213.GB30514@localhost> Reply-To: Nils Radtke MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Url: http://www.Think-Future.de X-Editor: Vi it! http://www.vim.org X-Bkp: p2mi User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, This might point to the same bug but seen from the process' perspective, it then contains additional info about hw and kernel versions/circumstances: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/2/18/104 This report might actually be related (in fact, same notebook): http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/981318 Daniel, I'm not sure I got what you intended to tell me w/: > There's a test patch in that bz entry (the one that adds two BUG_ONs). > If you're hitting these, is rather likely that it's the same bug. bz entry? I can't tell whether it's this exact bug. And I'm unfortunately a bit limited in using the notebook to test and crash it, it's not mine and therefore not always there to play with, if you intended me to apply some patch and test whether the notebook will crash at the BUG_ON()s. Thanks, Nils