linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nils Radtke <lkml@Think-Future.de>
To: linville@tuxdriver.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076, WAS: iwlagn + some accesspoint == hardlock
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 20:36:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100510183639.GA17523@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100503192219.GE25748@tuxdriver.com>

  Hi John,

  Today weather was fine again, finally. So testing with .33.3 w/ the patch applied: 

  http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=127290931304496&w=2

The kernel kernel .32 was still running before it crashed immediately on wireless activation.
The crash log showed again at least two messages, the last was as already described in my first
message, bug from 2010-04-30: I think even the 0x2030 was the same:

EIP rs_tx_status +x8f/x2030 




W/ .33.3 and the above patch applied:

Linux mypole 2.6.33.3 #18 SMP PREEMPT Thu May 6 21:51:37 CEST 2010 i686 GNU/Linux

May 10 19:14:11 [   80.586637] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
May 10 19:23:17 [  626.476078] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
May 10 19:23:30 [  638.913740] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
May 10 19:23:32 [  641.232425] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
May 10 19:23:54 [  663.392697] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
May 10 19:23:58 [  666.980247] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
May 10 19:24:02 [  671.121826] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now


Additionally these were logged, could you tell why they're there and what to do? (also .33.3 w/ patch)

May 10 19:24:16 [  685.079617] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:12:23:25 tid = 0
May 10 19:24:22 [  691.026737] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:12:23:25 tid = 0
May 10 19:28:02 [  911.406162] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:12:23:25 tid = 0
May 10 19:35:38 [ 1367.251240] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:12:23:25 tid = 0

The above "iwl_tx_agg_start" lines happen when connecting - again to a Cisco AP - and the connection gets
dropped the exact moment when a download is started. It even often drops when dhcp is still negotiating, has
got it's IP but the nego isn't finished yet. Conn drops, same procedure again and again. This happens only
with this Cisco AP (which is BTW another one from the "expected_tpt should have been calculated by now" 
problem).



Another type occurred: (probably .33.2 or something)

May  3 17:58:11 [ 3946.608743] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: request scan called when driver not ready.
May  3 17:58:12 [ 3948.082684] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: TX Power requested while scanning!
May  3 18:01:00 [ 4115.282852] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: RF_KILL bit toggled to disable radio.

Is this "TX Power requested while scanning" because of RF_KILL set to off?



  Thank you,

  Nils


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-10 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-03 19:17 kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076, WAS: iwlagn + some accesspoint == hardlock NilsRadtkelkml
2010-05-03 19:22 ` John W. Linville
2010-05-06  9:14   ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-06 16:28     ` reinette chatre
2010-05-11 15:50       ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-11 17:21         ` reinette chatre
2010-05-12 15:18           ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-10 18:36   ` Nils Radtke [this message]
2010-05-10 23:32     ` reinette chatre
2010-05-12 14:39       ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-12 23:14         ` reinette chatre
2010-05-13 10:34           ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-13 11:32           ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-13 16:31             ` reinette chatre
2010-05-14 17:45               ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-13 15:05           ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-17 23:19             ` reinette chatre
2010-05-20 12:15               ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-20 18:33                 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-31 20:12                   ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-02 17:51                     ` reinette chatre
2010-06-04 16:57                       ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-08 17:46                         ` reinette chatre
2010-06-10 14:22                           ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-10 16:19                             ` reinette chatre
2010-05-20 12:31               ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-20 18:26                 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-20 22:30                 ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-11  9:41 Nils Radtke
2010-04-29 18:26 kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076,was: iwlagn + some accesspoint = hardlock lkml

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100510183639.GA17523@localhost \
    --to=lkml@think-future.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).