public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86 platform driver: intelligent power sharing driver
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 11:38:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100511113836.3c6ade8e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100511111854.658a5520@virtuousgeek.org>

On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:18:54 -0700 Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:

> > > > +#define thm_writeb(off, val) writeb((val), ips->regmap + (off))
> > > > +#define thm_writew(off, val) writew((val), ips->regmap + (off))
> > > > +#define thm_writel(off, val) writel((val), ips->regmap + (off))
> > > 
> > > ick.
> > > 
> > > static inline unsigned short thm_readw(struct ips_driver *ips, unsigned offset)
> > > {
> > > 	readw(ips->regmap + offset);
> > > }
> > > 
> > > would be nicer.
> > 
> > Yes, it would.
> 
> No, I take that back, it just means more typing.  This idiom of
> expecting a given variable to be declared for the IO routines to work
> is pretty common in drivers,

yeah, but it sucks there, too.

> and saves a bunch of redundant "(ips," everywhere...

It's not redundant - it's C.

grr.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-11 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-10 21:25 Intelligent power sharing driver Jesse Barnes
2010-05-10 21:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] timer: add on-stack deferrable timer interfaces Jesse Barnes
2010-05-10 21:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86 platform driver: intelligent power sharing driver Jesse Barnes
2010-05-11  2:00   ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-11 14:59     ` Jesse Barnes
2010-05-11 18:18       ` Jesse Barnes
2010-05-11 15:38         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-05-11 18:59           ` Jesse Barnes
2010-05-14 22:41     ` Jesse Barnes
2010-05-15  8:54     ` Andy Isaacson
2010-05-15 16:29       ` Jesse Barnes
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-26 23:29 [RFC] Intelligent " Jesse Barnes
2010-03-26 23:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86 platform driver: intelligent " Jesse Barnes
2010-04-13 19:24   ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-13 19:40     ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100511113836.3c6ade8e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox