From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>,
"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: allow initialization of previously allocated request_queue
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 15:21:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100511132156.GX27497@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100511131856.GB25211@redhat.com>
On Tue, May 11 2010, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Tue, May 11 2010 at 2:55am -0400,
> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 10 2010, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > blk_init_queue() allocates the request_queue structure and then
> > > initializes it as needed (request_fn, elevator, etc).
> > >
> > > Split initialization out to blk_init_allocated_queue_node.
> > > Introduce blk_init_allocated_queue wrapper function to model existing
> > > blk_init_queue and blk_init_queue_node interfaces.
> > >
> > > Export elv_register_queue to allow a newly added elevator to be
> > > registered with sysfs. Export elv_unregister_queue for symmetry.
> > >
> > > These changes allow DM to initialize a device's request_queue with more
> > > precision. In particular, DM no longer unconditionally initializes a
> > > full request_queue (elevator et al). It only does so for a
> > > request-based DM device.
> >
> > Looks good, I'll apply this. I don't think the exports need to be _GPL
> > in this case, generally I've only done that with the exports for hooking
> > in a new IO scheduler.
>
> OK, thanks for picking this up. Do you want me to send v2 that drops
> the _GPL or will you make those changes?
I just hand-edited that part. I can add the dm bit as well, when it has
been reviewed and acked.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-11 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-10 22:55 [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: allow initialization of previously allocated request_queue Mike Snitzer
2010-05-10 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] dm: only initialize full request_queue for request-based device Mike Snitzer
2010-05-11 4:23 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-11 13:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-12 8:23 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-13 3:57 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-14 8:06 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-14 14:08 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-17 9:27 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-17 17:27 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-18 8:32 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-18 13:46 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-19 5:57 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-19 12:01 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-19 14:39 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-19 14:45 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-20 11:21 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-20 17:07 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-21 8:32 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-21 13:34 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-24 9:58 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2010-05-19 21:51 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-13 4:31 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " Mike Snitzer
2010-05-13 5:02 ` [RFC PATCH 3/2] dm: bio-based device must not register elevator in sysfs Mike Snitzer
2010-05-13 22:14 ` [PATCH 3/2 v2] " Mike Snitzer
2010-05-11 6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] block: allow initialization of previously allocated request_queue Jens Axboe
2010-05-11 13:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-05-11 13:21 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100511132156.GX27497@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=knikanth@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).