linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nils Radtke <lkml@Think-Future.de>
To: reinette.chatre@intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076, WAS: iwlagn + some accesspoint == hardlock
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 16:39:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100512143900.GB6793@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273534324.2370.6740.camel@rchatre-DESK>

  Hi,

Problem regarding expected tpt calculation: (at site A)
  Tested w/ Linux mypole 2.6.33.3 #21 SMP PREEMPT Tue May 11 11:41:07 CEST 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
  and iwl recovery patches applied.

[28766.975878] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: loaded firmware version 228.61.2.24
[28770.306101] eth1: direct probe to AP 00:1a:70:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28770.506282] eth1: direct probe to AP 00:1a:70:aa:bb:cc (try 2)
[28770.512298] eth1: direct probe responded
[28770.512308] eth1: authenticate with AP 00:1a:70:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28770.712518] eth1: authenticate with AP 00:1a:70:aa:bb:cc (try 2)
[28770.714378] eth1: authenticated
[28770.714419] eth1: associate with AP 00:1a:70:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28770.914282] eth1: associate with AP 00:1a:70:aa:bb:cc (try 2)
[28770.917618] eth1: RX AssocResp from 00:1a:70:aa:bb:cc (capab=0x401 status=0 aid=2)
[28770.917626] eth1: associated
[28777.113828] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
[28777.991207] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
[28778.621611] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
[28788.508867] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now

Messages of the type of the last line all over the logs, coming in triples, couples or alone..

Then, there are again these msgs: (site A again)

[29001.505362] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:aa:bb:cc tid = 0
[29039.037933] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:aa:bb:cc tid = 0

and so on. Associated w/ poor throughput.

  - - -

Problem regarding the deauths/reconnects (sometimes combined w/ bad throughput):

  Tested w/ Linux mypole 2.6.33.3 #21 SMP PREEMPT Tue May 11 11:41:07 CEST 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
  and iwl recovery patches applied.

RFKILL switch on, wpa_cli stat showed auth.

First auth: conn failed during https login

[28018.602587] eth1: deauthenticated from 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (Reason: 2)
[28018.900400] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: TX Power requested while scanning!
[28018.900411] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: Error sending TX power (-11)
[28018.921465] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: request scan called when driver not ready.

started knoppix download w/ 20k/s avg, got 88kb when:
[28225.669850] eth1: deauthenticated from 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (Reason: 2)

next try: no deauth but throughput was: --.-K/s
on abortion of wget and retry: deauth:

[28376.132933] eth1: deauthenticated from 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (Reason: 2)
[28376.253981] eth1: direct probe to AP 00:23:eb:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28376.768958] eth1: direct probe to AP 00:23:eb:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28376.771879] eth1: direct probe responded
[28376.771887] eth1: authenticate with AP 00:23:eb:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28376.971307] eth1: authenticate with AP 00:23:eb:aa:bb:cc (try 2)
[28376.974411] eth1: authenticated
[28376.974455] eth1: associate with AP 00:23:eb:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28377.174290] eth1: associate with AP 00:23:eb:aa:bb:cc (try 2)
[28377.180867] eth1: RX AssocResp from 00:23:eb:aa:bb:cc (capab=0x421 status=0 aid=11)
[28377.180875] eth1: associated

Then again, doing nothing:
[28406.222404] eth1: deauthenticated from 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (Reason: 2)
[28409.836210] eth1: direct probe to AP 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28410.036330] eth1: direct probe to AP 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (try 2)
[28410.039365] eth1: direct probe responded
[28410.039377] eth1: authenticate with AP 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28410.239290] eth1: authenticate with AP 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (try 2)
[28410.245375] eth1: authenticated
[28410.245419] eth1: associate with AP 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28410.445346] eth1: associate with AP 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (try 2)
[28410.448273] eth1: RX AssocResp from 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (capab=0x421 status=0 aid=17)
[28410.448282] eth1: associated

and so on:
[28476.948459] eth1: deauthenticated from 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (Reason: 2)
[28477.059629] eth1: direct probe to AP 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28477.590389] eth1: direct probe to AP 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28477.607096] eth1: direct probe responded
[28477.607106] eth1: authenticate with AP 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28477.807275] eth1: authenticate with AP 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (try 2)
[28477.812340] eth1: authenticated
[28477.812382] eth1: associate with AP 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (try 1)
[28478.012397] eth1: associate with AP 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (try 2)
[28478.014914] eth1: RX AssocResp from 00:40:96:aa:bb:cc (capab=0x421 status=0 aid=19)
[28478.014922] eth1: associated

So, this is a real blocker. 

BTW, what is so particular about cisco APs? Again, this is a problem only w/ cisco (different site B, 
though):
0:40:96 Cisco Systems, Inc.

  Thanks.

  Cheers,

            Nils


  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-12 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-03 19:17 kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076, WAS: iwlagn + some accesspoint == hardlock NilsRadtkelkml
2010-05-03 19:22 ` John W. Linville
2010-05-06  9:14   ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-06 16:28     ` reinette chatre
2010-05-11 15:50       ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-11 17:21         ` reinette chatre
2010-05-12 15:18           ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-10 18:36   ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-10 23:32     ` reinette chatre
2010-05-12 14:39       ` Nils Radtke [this message]
2010-05-12 23:14         ` reinette chatre
2010-05-13 10:34           ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-13 11:32           ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-13 16:31             ` reinette chatre
2010-05-14 17:45               ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-13 15:05           ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-17 23:19             ` reinette chatre
2010-05-20 12:15               ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-20 18:33                 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-31 20:12                   ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-02 17:51                     ` reinette chatre
2010-06-04 16:57                       ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-08 17:46                         ` reinette chatre
2010-06-10 14:22                           ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-10 16:19                             ` reinette chatre
2010-05-20 12:31               ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-20 18:26                 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-20 22:30                 ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-11  9:41 Nils Radtke
2010-04-29 18:26 kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076,was: iwlagn + some accesspoint = hardlock lkml

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100512143900.GB6793@localhost \
    --to=lkml@think-future.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).