From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org, gorcunov@gmail.com,
aris@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
randy.dunlap@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] [nmi watchdog] touch_softlockup cleanups and softlockup_tick removal
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 22:06:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100512200652.GF10028@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1273266711-18706-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 05:11:45PM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> Just some code cleanup to make touch_softlockup clearer and remove the
> softlockup_tick function as it is no longer needed.
>
> Also remove the /proc softlockup_thres call as it has been changed to
> watchdog_thres.
>
> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 16 +++-------------
> kernel/sysctl.c | 9 ---------
> kernel/timer.c | 1 -
> kernel/watchdog.c | 35 +++--------------------------------
> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 2455ff5..e9c6c1d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -308,18 +308,14 @@ extern void scheduler_tick(void);
> extern void sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP
> -extern void softlockup_tick(void);
> extern void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void);
> extern void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void);
> -extern int proc_dosoftlockup_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> - void __user *buffer,
> - size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
> extern unsigned int softlockup_panic;
> extern int softlockup_thresh;
> +extern int proc_dowatchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> + void __user *buffer,
> + size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
> #else
> -static inline void softlockup_tick(void)
> -{
> -}
> static inline void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
> {
> }
> @@ -338,12 +334,6 @@ extern int proc_dohung_task_timeout_secs(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKUP_DETECTOR
> -extern int proc_dowatchdog_thresh(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> - void __user *buffer,
> - size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
> -#endif
> -
> /* Attach to any functions which should be ignored in wchan output. */
> #define __sched __attribute__((__section__(".sched.text")))
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index 1083897..1fec781 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -827,15 +827,6 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
> .extra1 = &zero,
> .extra2 = &one,
> },
> - {
> - .procname = "softlockup_thresh",
> - .data = &softlockup_thresh,
> - .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> - .mode = 0644,
> - .proc_handler = proc_dosoftlockup_thresh,
> - .extra1 = &neg_one,
> - .extra2 = &sixty,
> - },
I wonder about the ABI breakage.
But I suspect few userspace tools use it though, since this is
mostly for kernel dev.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-12 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-07 21:11 [PATCH 0/8] lockup detector changes Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 1/8] [watchdog] combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup Don Zickus
2010-05-12 19:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-13 6:51 ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup detector tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 2/8] [nmi watchdog] touch_softlockup cleanups and softlockup_tick removal Don Zickus
2010-05-12 20:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-05-12 20:26 ` Don Zickus
2010-05-12 20:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-12 20:56 ` Don Zickus
2010-05-12 21:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-12 21:38 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-05-12 21:50 ` Don Zickus
2010-05-13 15:53 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-05-13 16:04 ` Don Zickus
2010-05-13 6:52 ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Touch_softlockup " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 3/8] [watchdog] remove old softlockup code Don Zickus
2010-05-13 6:52 ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Remove " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 4/8] [watchdog] remove nmi_watchdog.c file Don Zickus
2010-05-13 6:52 ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Remove " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 5/8] [x86] watchdog: move trigger_all_cpu_backtrace to its own die_notifier Don Zickus
2010-05-13 6:53 ` [tip:perf/nmi] x86: Move " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 6/8] [x86] watchdog: cleanup hw_nmi.c cruft Don Zickus
2010-05-13 6:53 ` [tip:perf/nmi] x86: Cleanup " tip-bot for Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 7/8] [watchdog] resolve softlockup.c conflicts Don Zickus
2010-05-07 21:11 ` [PATCH 8/8] [watchdog] separate touch_nmi_watchdog code path from touch_watchdog Don Zickus
2010-05-13 6:53 ` [tip:perf/nmi] lockup_detector: Separate " tip-bot for Don Zickus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100512200652.GF10028@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=aris@redhat.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).