From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756229Ab0ELWPk (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 18:15:40 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:34949 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754909Ab0ELWPi (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 May 2010 18:15:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 15:14:34 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Tejun Heo Cc: Rusty Russell , Peter Zijlstra , Jiri Kosina , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , stable@kernel.org, Jiri Benc , Mathieu Desnoyers , Anton Blanchard , Ingo Molnar , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Eric Dumazet , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, stable-review@kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [stable] [171/197] module: fix __module_ref_addr() Message-ID: <20100512221434.GA2786@kroah.com> References: <20100422191857.GA13268@kroah.com> <20100422190922.702027944@kvm.kroah.org> <20100428165201.3d7d6b4a@griffin.suse.cz> <20100428162056.GA2846@Krystal> <20100428185550.4406319c@logostar.upir.cz> <4BD86F3D.7040907@kernel.org> <20100428172944.GA14660@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100428172944.GA14660@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:29:44AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 07:24:13PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On 04/28/2010 06:55 PM, Jiri Benc wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:20:56 -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > >> Can you try reverting commit c8d52465f95c4187871f8e65666c07806ca06d41 and see if > > >> it helps ? > > > > > > It doesn't. The produced code is identical. > > > > > >> If you have other compiler versions handy, that would also be helpful to see if > > >> the problem is specific to the gcc version you are using. > > > > > > Tried 4.5.0, the same problem (at least looking at the produced assembler > > > code, I haven't booted the kernel, but it looks very similar to 4.3.3). > > > > I wrote on the bugzilla but this is not a compiler bug but the -stable > > patch shouldn't have been applied only to 2.6.33. Not 2.6.32. This > > is because till 2.6.32, ia64 hadn't been converted to dynamic percpu > > allocator, so its static and dynamic percpu areas were separate and > > the per_cpu_ptr() wouldn't do the offsetting the module code expects > > there. So, please revert the patch from 2.6.32. > > Ah crap, I missed that. I'll go revert it from .32 now, sorry about > that. And of course, I forgot to do that before releasing the next .32 kernel. It will be in the one after this one. bah. greg k-h