From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757800Ab0EMRgc (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2010 13:36:32 -0400 Received: from mail-gw0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:38951 "EHLO mail-gw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756003Ab0EMRga (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2010 13:36:30 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-url:user-agent; b=JOcQuVVmnNYbvJwe8Qa7w0Fl5/JtlIzLXCZBJs6Kl08kNYA8+2ShRMU4CBeyPM7UR5 6+iTUiS6RbhNGQiJxU62T6z9KBtPfjbrN/of6K8qT/FtY7nxVUSmLZ+1kjjZt9UsNBbD 07Tk2kPkhU7xlYYU8aWNbuXkMOccxuw9emUss= Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 14:36:23 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Chase Douglas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: perf: relative path to source for perf probe? Message-ID: <20100513173623.GL19192@ghostprotocols.net> References: <20100513145826.GJ30926@ghostprotocols.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, May 13, 2010 at 05:51:45PM +0200, Chase Douglas escreveu: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > wrote: > > Probably you won't find this if you look at the old 2.6.34 codebase > > (yay, for tools/perf it is already hundreds of patches behind :-)), so > > I recomend you look at what we have in linux-2.6-tip, branch > > tip/perf/core, what is in 2.6.34 is in tip/perf/urgent and right now, > > IIRC, just a one patch that is not in 2.6.34 proper, a cherry-pick from > > tip/perf/core, no less :-) > > Where are these branches? I've looked at: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/acme/linux-2.6.git;a=summary > > but I don't see these branches listed. Well, if you decide to go from my tree, its all in the "perf" branch, but I'd recommend you follow Ingo, my git tree, at the moment, is just a conduit to get things out to him, which happens without noticeable delay once I send a pull request. > Thanks for the pointers! You're welcome, please let us know about any other thing we may be of help to make you of help to us ;-) > -- Chase