From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759540Ab0EMWZN (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2010 18:25:13 -0400 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:53424 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755034Ab0EMWZK (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 May 2010 18:25:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 18:24:25 -0400 From: tytso@mit.edu To: Tony Lindgren Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Matthew Garrett , Alan Stern , Paul Walmsley , Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= , Linux-pm mailing list , Kernel development list , Tejun Heo , Oleg Nesterov , Kevin Hilman , magnus.damm@gmail.com, mark gross , Arjan van de Ven , Geoff Smith , Brian Swetland , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Cousson , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Vitaly Wool , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 6) Message-ID: <20100513222425.GC16989@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: tytso@mit.edu, Tony Lindgren , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Matthew Garrett , Alan Stern , Paul Walmsley , Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= , Linux-pm mailing list , Kernel development list , Tejun Heo , Oleg Nesterov , Kevin Hilman , magnus.damm@gmail.com, mark gross , Arjan van de Ven , Geoff Smith , Brian Swetland , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt?= Cousson , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Vitaly Wool , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood References: <20100513202320.GF3428@atomide.com> <20100513203412.GA21244@srcf.ucam.org> <201005132321.59245.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100513212556.GI3428@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100513212556.GI3428@atomide.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 02:25:56PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > I agree and I don't understand the problem that people have with the > > opportunistic suspend feature. > > It seems to be picking quite a few comments for one. It's picking up a lot of comments because *someone* seems to be trying to use a "last post wins" style of argumentation. One of the things that is hard for people who aren't regular denizens of LKML is to understand whose comments can be ignored..... Seriously, you are posting a lot, but it's not clear you're making any clear sense... - Ted