From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755814Ab0ENQ3R (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2010 12:29:17 -0400 Received: from mail-px0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:61450 "EHLO mail-px0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752743Ab0ENQ3P (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2010 12:29:15 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ObaSlJF4mkJo/W1MNIpUFTLTuOcaQ+Kd7nfkvoK2EtBCclwaXV+Q4KdYkAgYPsByFu Rx176oSPkMYzDcWpx15tiarr4YEoh6uOtOgMAEUpdFsqp7QfLxQtkqpo23nahWlGCeti HUiRi1xuvllksyV0jS1i8gUGU9uLvjZjXGBYs= Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 09:28:59 -0700 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Matthew Garrett , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Bastien Nocera Subject: Re: [git pull] Input updates for 2.6.34-rc6 Message-ID: <20100514162858.GA31607@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <20100513075728.GF30110@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20100514145539.GA5598@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:16:34AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Fri, 14 May 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > I've done some experimentation under qemu. On ACPI systems, Windows will > > *only* touch the keyboard controller if there's a device with an > > appropriate PNP HID or CID and if _STA evaluates to 0x0b or 0x0f. > > Otherwise it'll simply ignore the hardware entirely. By the looks of it > > their keyboard probing is also somewhat different to ours, but that's > > probably another story. > > Well, I'd hate to lose the keyboard hotplug capability, but at the same > time, it _is_ 2010, and while I have personally used it historically, I > don't really foresee ever using it again. > FWIW we also using active multiplexing while windows does not as far as I know. I'd like us to be better than them. > So we _could_ decide to just try it, and see if anybody screams. If nobody > does, that would be a very simple solution to the problem. > > Linus -- Dmitry