From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758339Ab0ENRpM (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2010 13:45:12 -0400 Received: from relay01.mx.bawue.net ([193.7.176.67]:45406 "EHLO relay01.mx.bawue.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756706Ab0ENRpJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 May 2010 13:45:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 19:45:06 +0200 From: Nils Radtke To: reinette.chatre@intel.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076, WAS: iwlagn + some accesspoint == hardlock Message-ID: <20100514174506.GD18740@localhost> Reply-To: Nils Radtke MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1273768269.2295.1144.camel@rchatre-DESK> X-Url: http://www.Think-Future.de X-Editor: Vi it! http://www.vim.org X-Bkp: p2mi User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Reinette, Might be of interest: [63099.789939] eth1: associated [63166.919257] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now [63180.322024] Hangcheck: hangcheck value past margin! [63190.664526] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now [63193.255873] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now [63194.941768] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now [63195.099286] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now [63196.524065] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now [63197.417740] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now [63199.767526] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:aa:aa:aa tid = 0 [63205.689184] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:aa:aa:aa tid = 0 [63210.821316] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:aa:aa:aa tid = 0 [63228.178530] iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: iwl_tx_agg_start on ra = 00:1a:70:aa:aa:aa tid = 0 Happened on site B, with high throughput (280-340k/s). So, it's happening w/ both, fast and slow conn speed. Yes, I noticed and had a look into the compat-wireless scripts but preferred to do it manually. Thank you for your explanation. Cheers, Nils