From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751693Ab0EQOBp (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 10:01:45 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:50740 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750896Ab0EQOBn (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 May 2010 10:01:43 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 07:04:40 -0700 From: Arjan van de Ven To: Donald Allen Cc: Thomas Gleixner , john stultz , LKML Subject: Re: PROBLEM: tickless scheduling Message-ID: <20100517070440.13d193aa@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1273540344.3843.101.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1273697523.2856.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Organization: Intel X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by casper.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 May 2010 09:44:47 -0400 Donald Allen wrote: > I will do the experiment suggested by Arjan van de Ven and report the > results of that separately. since you're losing interrupts.. another good option to try is "irqpoll" -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org