From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752941Ab0ESAug (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 20:50:36 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.21]:7294 "EHLO orsmga101.jf.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751876Ab0ESAuf (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 May 2010 20:50:35 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,258,1272870000"; d="scan'208";a="622830983" Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 08:50:32 +0800 From: Huaxu Wan To: Dmitry Gromov Cc: "Wan, Huaxu" , Andrew Morton , LM Sensors , LKML , Carsten Emde Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 0/2] hwmon: Update coretemp to current Intel processors Message-ID: <20100519005032.GA26906@owl> References: <20100510035031.GD9181@owl> <20100514065808.GA11598@owl> <20100517094136.094800562@osadl.org> <625BA99ED14B2D499DC4E29D8138F150181F574C31@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02:45 Tue 18 May, Dmitry Gromov wrote: > Hi! > > And 90C seems to be good for N200 series of Atom CPUs only - I could not > find TjMax value published for N330 Dual Core (quite popular one). Intel > only published Tcase for it: > http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=35641 > So, if for N270 Tcase = TjMax = 90C, then, I'd suggest to use Tcase = 85.2C > for N330 TjMax value. Quoted a sentence from [1], "Unless specified otherwise, all specifications for the processor are at TJ = 90°C", I believe the TjMax of 330 is 90C too. [1]http://download.intel.com/design/processor/datashts/320528.pdf Thanks Huaxu