From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v2] V4l bkl ioctl pushdown
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:55:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100519105519.GA1213@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201005180850.27813.hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 08:50:27AM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Monday 17 May 2010 08:50:48 Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the second attempt to pushdown the bkl in v4l fops ioctl
> > handlers.
> >
> > Amongst the changes:
> >
> > - keep video_ioctl2() unlocked but bring a new video_ioctl2_bkl()
> > that drivers can use and attribute to their .unlocked_ioctl instead.
> >
> > - two new (or it I missed them last time) drivers have been included
> > to the pushdown.
> >
> > This is against a fresh v4l/master.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> Other than the single comment about the vivi driver in patch 3/4:
>
> Acked-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
>
> It looks good to me and it would be nice if this could be merged for 2.6.35.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
Thanks I'm fixing the issue with the vivi driver and will resend the set
with your acks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-19 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-17 6:50 [PATCH 0/4 v2] V4l bkl ioctl pushdown Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-17 6:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] v4l: Introduce video_ioctl2_bkl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-17 6:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] v4l: Convert video_ioctl2 to video_ioctl2_bkl for users that need the bkl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-17 6:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] v4l: Pushdown bkl to drivers that implement their own ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-18 6:47 ` Hans Verkuil
2010-05-17 6:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] v4l: Remove struct v4l2_file_operations::ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-18 6:50 ` [PATCH 0/4 v2] V4l bkl ioctl pushdown Hans Verkuil
2010-05-19 10:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100519105519.GA1213@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=jblunck@gmail.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox