From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754295Ab0ESU57 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 16:57:59 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:59199 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751383Ab0ESU56 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2010 16:57:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:57:54 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: OGAWA Hirofumi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Adds ratelimit_state_init() Message-Id: <20100519135754.17afd645.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <87k4r3cqgz.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> References: <87k4r3cqgz.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 May 2010 09:38:20 +0900 OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > Andrew, this is the part of fatfs error ratelimit. I.e. fatfs change is > depending to this patch. > > I guess this area usually is sent to you. But, if this patch > wasn't applied before fatfs change, fatfs will break. > > Well, so, can I pass fatfs patch to you? Or, I should apply this to > fatfs-tree too? Is OK, I'll send them both in for 2.6.35, thanks.