From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Autofs <autofs@linux.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] autofs: Pushdown the bkl from ioctl
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 20:08:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100519180832.GA9752@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF4279C.2000805@zytor.com>
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:02:04AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/19/2010 10:24 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > * generate kernel reactions
> > */
> > -static int autofs_root_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
> > +static int autofs_root_ioctl_unlocked(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
> > unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > struct autofs_sb_info *sbi = autofs_sbi(inode->i_sb);
> > @@ -579,3 +579,16 @@ static int autofs_root_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp,
> > return -ENOSYS;
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > +static long autofs_root_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> > + unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> > +{
>
> The choice of naming here seems reverse in my opinion.
Oh, why?
The function that holds the bkl calls its unlocked version.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-19 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-19 17:24 [PATCH 0/8] Another set of ioctl bkl pushdown, almost the end Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 1/8] ecryptfs: Pushdown the bkl from ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-20 23:39 ` Tyler Hicks
2010-05-20 23:42 ` [PATCH] vfs/eCryptfs: Handle ioctl calls with unlocked and compat functions Tyler Hicks
2010-05-21 6:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-05-21 7:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 2/8] autofs: Pushdown the bkl from ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 18:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-19 18:08 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-05-19 18:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-19 18:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 19:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 20:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-20 11:35 ` Ian Kent
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 3/8] autofs4: " Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 4/8] sunrpc: " Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 5/8] sunrpc: Pushdown the bkl from sunrpc cache ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 6/8] uml: Pushdown the bkl from harddog_kern ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 7/8] cris: Pushdown the bkl from ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-19 17:24 ` [PATCH 8/8] ia64: Use unlocked_ioctl from perfmon Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-20 11:26 ` [PATCH 0/8] Another set of ioctl bkl pushdown, almost the end Jan Kara
2010-05-20 11:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100519180832.GA9752@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).