public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nils Radtke <lkml@Think-Future.de>
To: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076, WAS: iwlagn + some accesspoint == hardlock
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 14:31:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100520123144.GA8153@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274138381.2091.4864.camel@rchatre-DESK>


  Hi Reinette,

  Did the fix like the patch below, applied on top of yours. Builds well, 
  not tested yet.

  Do you ACK this patch?

  Thanks,

          Nils


# 1) Error messages like: 
# iwlagn 0000:03:00.0: expected_tpt should have been calculated by now
# To address (1), could you please run with attached debug patch and also
# enable rate scaling debugging. That will be "modprobe iwlagn
# debug=0x143fff).

# diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c
# index b93e491..60e5323 100644
# --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c
# +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c
# @@ -361,6 +361,8 @@ static int rs_collect_tx_data(struct iwl_rate_scale_data *windows,
#  	 * subtract "1" from the success counter (this is the main reason
#  	 * we keep these bitmaps!).
#  	 */
# +	IWL_DEBUG_RATE(priv, "attempts = %d, window->counter = %d\n",
# +			attempts, window->counter);
#  	while (attempts > 0) {
#  		if (window->counter >= IWL_RATE_MAX_WINDOW) {
#  
# @@ -389,6 +391,7 @@ static int rs_collect_tx_data(struct iwl_rate_scale_data *windows,
#  		attempts--;
#  	}
#  
# +	IWL_DEBUG_RATE(priv, "window counter = %d \n", window->counter);
#  	/* Calculate current success ratio, avoid divide-by-0! */
#  	if (window->counter > 0)
#  		window->success_ratio = 128 * (100 * window->success_counter)
# @@ -849,6 +852,7 @@ static void rs_tx_status(void *priv_r, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband,
#  	 * first index into rate scale table.
#  	 */
#  	if (info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_STAT_AMPDU) {
# +		IWL_DEBUG_RATE(priv, "Updating aggregation history\n");
#  		tx_rate = le32_to_cpu(table->rs_table[0].rate_n_flags);
#  		rs_get_tbl_info_from_mcs(tx_rate, priv->band, &tbl_type,
#  				&rs_index);
# @@ -868,6 +872,7 @@ static void rs_tx_status(void *priv_r, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband,
#  	 * For legacy, update frame history with for each Tx retry.
#  	 */
#  		retries = info->status.rates[0].count - 1;
# +		IWL_DEBUG_RATE(priv, "Updating legacy history. retries = %d \n", retries);
#  		/* HW doesn't send more than 15 retries */
#  		retries = min(retries, 15);
#  

---

 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.33.3_clean/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.33.3_clean.orig/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c	2010-05-20 14:25:42.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.33.3_clean/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c	2010-05-20 14:26:50.000000000 +0200
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@
  */
 static int rs_collect_tx_data(struct iwl_rate_scale_data *windows,
 			      int scale_index, s32 tpt, int attempts,
-			      int successes)
+			      int successes, struct iwl_priv *priv)
 {
 	struct iwl_rate_scale_data *window = NULL;
 	static const u64 mask = (((u64)1) << (IWL_RATE_MAX_WINDOW - 1));
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@
 		tpt = get_expected_tpt(curr_tbl, rs_index);
 		rs_collect_tx_data(window, rs_index, tpt,
 				   info->status.ampdu_ack_len,
-				   info->status.ampdu_ack_map);
+				   info->status.ampdu_ack_map, priv);
 
 		/* Update success/fail counts if not searching for new mode */
 		if (lq_sta->stay_in_tbl) {
@@ -897,10 +897,10 @@
 			/* Constants mean 1 transmission, 0 successes */
 			if (i < retries)
 				rs_collect_tx_data(window, rs_index, tpt, 1,
-						0);
+						0, priv);
 			else
 				rs_collect_tx_data(window, rs_index, tpt, 1,
-						legacy_success);
+						legacy_success, priv);
 		}
 
 		/* Update success/fail counts if not searching for new mode */

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-05-20 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-03 19:17 kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076, WAS: iwlagn + some accesspoint == hardlock NilsRadtkelkml
2010-05-03 19:22 ` John W. Linville
2010-05-06  9:14   ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-06 16:28     ` reinette chatre
2010-05-11 15:50       ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-11 17:21         ` reinette chatre
2010-05-12 15:18           ` Christian Borntraeger
2010-05-10 18:36   ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-10 23:32     ` reinette chatre
2010-05-12 14:39       ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-12 23:14         ` reinette chatre
2010-05-13 10:34           ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-13 11:32           ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-13 16:31             ` reinette chatre
2010-05-14 17:45               ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-13 15:05           ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-17 23:19             ` reinette chatre
2010-05-20 12:15               ` Nils Radtke
2010-05-20 18:33                 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-31 20:12                   ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-02 17:51                     ` reinette chatre
2010-06-04 16:57                       ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-08 17:46                         ` reinette chatre
2010-06-10 14:22                           ` Nils Radtke
2010-06-10 16:19                             ` reinette chatre
2010-05-20 12:31               ` Nils Radtke [this message]
2010-05-20 18:26                 ` reinette chatre
2010-05-20 22:30                 ` David Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-05-11  9:41 Nils Radtke
2010-04-29 18:26 kernel BUG in iwl-agn-rs.c:2076,was: iwlagn + some accesspoint = hardlock lkml

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100520123144.GA8153@localhost \
    --to=lkml@think-future.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox