Re: [PATCH 2/2]: atomic_t: Remove volatile from atomic_t definition

Linus Torvalds
2010-05-17T15:04:53Z

On Mon, 17 May 2010, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>
> It turns out this bad code is a result of us defining atomic_t as a
> volatile int.

Heh. Ok, as you point out in the commit message, I obviously agree with
this patch. "volatile" on data is evil, with the possible exception of
"jiffies" type things.

So applied.

Linus