* [PATCH] drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio: check return value of gpiochip_remove()
@ 2010-05-19 15:28 Daniel Mack
2010-05-21 19:21 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Mack @ 2010-05-19 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Daniel Mack, Andrew Morton, Denis Turischev
This eliminates the following build warning:
drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c: In function ‘it8761e_gpio_exit’:
drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c:220: warning: ignoring return value of ‘gpiochip_remove’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Denis Turischev <denis@compulab.co.il>
---
drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c
index 753219c..a524bd8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c
@@ -217,7 +217,10 @@ gpiochip_add_err:
static void __exit it8761e_gpio_exit(void)
{
if (gpio_ba) {
- gpiochip_remove(&it8761e_gpio_chip);
+ int ret = gpiochip_remove(&it8761e_gpio_chip);
+
+ WARN(ret, "%s(): gpiochip_remove() failed, ret=%d\n",
+ __func__, ret);
release_region(gpio_ba, GPIO_IOSIZE);
gpio_ba = 0;
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio: check return value of gpiochip_remove()
2010-05-19 15:28 [PATCH] drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio: check return value of gpiochip_remove() Daniel Mack
@ 2010-05-21 19:21 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2010-05-21 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Mack; +Cc: linux-kernel, Denis Turischev
On Wed, 19 May 2010 17:28:33 +0200
Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de> wrote:
> This eliminates the following build warning:
>
> drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c: In function ___it8761e_gpio_exit___:
> drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c:220: warning: ignoring return value of ___gpiochip_remove___, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Denis Turischev <denis@compulab.co.il>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c
> index 753219c..a524bd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,10 @@ gpiochip_add_err:
> static void __exit it8761e_gpio_exit(void)
> {
> if (gpio_ba) {
> - gpiochip_remove(&it8761e_gpio_chip);
> + int ret = gpiochip_remove(&it8761e_gpio_chip);
> +
> + WARN(ret, "%s(): gpiochip_remove() failed, ret=%d\n",
> + __func__, ret);
>
> release_region(gpio_ba, GPIO_IOSIZE);
> gpio_ba = 0;
So I just looked through ten-odd gpio drivers to see how they handle
gpiochip_remove() failures. Big mess.
All of them do some form of printk, with no consistency.
Some of them bale out on error, leaking resources. Others just proceed
to release the possibly-in-use resources.
I'd suggest that gpiochip_remove() itself emit the warning, so we can
remove zillions of inconsistent warnings from drivers.
I'd also suggest that someone get down and work out what a suitable
recovery strategy is. Probably, just leaking the possibly-still-used
resources is the safest approach. Once the strategy is decided, lots
of drivers need work.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-21 19:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-19 15:28 [PATCH] drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio: check return value of gpiochip_remove() Daniel Mack
2010-05-21 19:21 ` Andrew Morton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox