public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio: check return value of gpiochip_remove()
@ 2010-05-19 15:28 Daniel Mack
  2010-05-21 19:21 ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Mack @ 2010-05-19 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Daniel Mack, Andrew Morton, Denis Turischev

This eliminates the following build warning:

drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c: In function ‘it8761e_gpio_exit’:
drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c:220: warning: ignoring return value of ‘gpiochip_remove’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result

Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Denis Turischev <denis@compulab.co.il>
---
 drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c |    5 ++++-
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c
index 753219c..a524bd8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c
@@ -217,7 +217,10 @@ gpiochip_add_err:
 static void __exit it8761e_gpio_exit(void)
 {
 	if (gpio_ba) {
-		gpiochip_remove(&it8761e_gpio_chip);
+		int ret = gpiochip_remove(&it8761e_gpio_chip);
+
+		WARN(ret, "%s(): gpiochip_remove() failed, ret=%d\n",
+				__func__, ret);
 
 		release_region(gpio_ba, GPIO_IOSIZE);
 		gpio_ba = 0;
-- 
1.7.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio: check return value of gpiochip_remove()
  2010-05-19 15:28 [PATCH] drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio: check return value of gpiochip_remove() Daniel Mack
@ 2010-05-21 19:21 ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2010-05-21 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Mack; +Cc: linux-kernel, Denis Turischev

On Wed, 19 May 2010 17:28:33 +0200
Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de> wrote:

> This eliminates the following build warning:
> 
> drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c: In function ___it8761e_gpio_exit___:
> drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c:220: warning: ignoring return value of ___gpiochip_remove___, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@caiaq.de>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Denis Turischev <denis@compulab.co.il>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c |    5 ++++-
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c
> index 753219c..a524bd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,10 @@ gpiochip_add_err:
>  static void __exit it8761e_gpio_exit(void)
>  {
>  	if (gpio_ba) {
> -		gpiochip_remove(&it8761e_gpio_chip);
> +		int ret = gpiochip_remove(&it8761e_gpio_chip);
> +
> +		WARN(ret, "%s(): gpiochip_remove() failed, ret=%d\n",
> +				__func__, ret);
>  
>  		release_region(gpio_ba, GPIO_IOSIZE);
>  		gpio_ba = 0;

So I just looked through ten-odd gpio drivers to see how they handle
gpiochip_remove() failures.  Big mess.

All of them do some form of printk, with no consistency.

Some of them bale out on error, leaking resources.  Others just proceed
to release the possibly-in-use resources.

I'd suggest that gpiochip_remove() itself emit the warning, so we can
remove zillions of inconsistent warnings from drivers.

I'd also suggest that someone get down and work out what a suitable
recovery strategy is.  Probably, just leaking the possibly-still-used
resources is the safest approach.  Once the strategy is decided, lots
of drivers need work.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-21 19:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-19 15:28 [PATCH] drivers/gpio/it8761e_gpio: check return value of gpiochip_remove() Daniel Mack
2010-05-21 19:21 ` Andrew Morton

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox