From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758204Ab0EUUNO (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2010 16:13:14 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:39336 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753965Ab0EUUNM (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2010 16:13:12 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 13:13:03 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Florian Mickler Cc: Joe Perches , Stephen Hemminger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: improve config-file support Message-Id: <20100521131303.ad40e6d8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20100520084615.6e2efa38@schatten.dmk.lab> References: <1273698720-4010-1-git-send-email-florian@mickler.org> <1273703333.20514.392.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20100513095652.34aea727@schatten.dmk.lab> <20100520084615.6e2efa38@schatten.dmk.lab> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 20 May 2010 08:46:15 +0200 Florian Mickler wrote: > On Thu, 13 May 2010 09:56:52 +0200 > Florian Mickler wrote: > > > On Wed, 12 May 2010 15:28:53 -0700 > > Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2010-05-12 at 23:12 +0200, florian@mickler.org wrote: > > > > This changes the syntax of the config-file introduced in the commit > > > > "scripts/get_maintainer.pl: add .get_maintainer.conf default options > > > > file". > > > > Entries are now of the more commonly found form: > > > > key = value > > > > where keys are cmd-line arguments without the "--" prefixed. > > > > > > I don't have a strong opinion one way or another about the > > > .conf file format. > > > > > > Another option which could be useful: --noconf, don't read the file. > > > > > > > as well as warn if unrecognized options are > > > > specified. > > > > > > The old approach does that as well. > > > > True. > > > > > > > > > +if (!GetOptions( \%prefs, > > > > > > I think you don't need to repeat the options. > > > Doesn't this work? > > > if (!GetOptions(\%prefs)) { > > > die "$P: invalid argument - use --help if necessary\n"; > > > > > No, GetOpts::Long needs a special markup for parsing the cmdline > > string, like =s for specifying that that option is accompanied by a > > string value or the ! for specifying that it is a flag. > > Also there are aliases defined for config-options. > > > > Hi Andrew! > > What's the status of this patch? > Do you take it, or do you have an issue with it? This is a clear > improvement in my opinion. > (top-posting repaired) Joe didn't sound very excited about it. If we're going to do this, we should hurry up, please - it'd be silly to introduce a config file and then change its format shortly afterwards.