* [PATCH -mm 0/2] misc: don't use sig->count
@ 2010-03-23 14:48 Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-21 10:08 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2010-03-23 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: David Howells, Peter Zijlstra, Roland McGrath, linux-kernel
Trivial.
According to grep, get_nr_threads() becomes the only user of sig->count.
Oleg.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -mm 0/2] misc: don't use sig->count
2010-03-23 14:48 [PATCH -mm 0/2] misc: don't use sig->count Oleg Nesterov
@ 2010-05-21 10:08 ` David Howells
2010-05-21 13:35 ` Andrew Morton
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2010-05-21 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov
Cc: dhowells, Andrew Morton, Peter Zijlstra, Roland McGrath,
linux-kernel
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> According to grep, get_nr_threads() becomes the only user of sig->count.
Are these two patches going upstream in this window?
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH -mm 0/2] misc: don't use sig->count
2010-05-21 10:08 ` David Howells
@ 2010-05-21 13:35 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-21 15:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-24 14:28 ` David Howells
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2010-05-21 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells; +Cc: Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Roland McGrath, linux-kernel
On Fri, 21 May 2010 11:08:16 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > According to grep, get_nr_threads() becomes the only user of sig->count.
>
> Are these two patches going upstream in this window?
>
Sure, unless there's a reason not to do this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -mm 0/2] misc: don't use sig->count
2010-05-21 10:08 ` David Howells
2010-05-21 13:35 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2010-05-21 15:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-24 14:28 ` David Howells
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2010-05-21 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Peter Zijlstra, Roland McGrath, linux-kernel
On 05/21, David Howells wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > According to grep, get_nr_threads() becomes the only user of sig->count.
>
> Are these two patches going upstream in this window?
We should ask Andrew.
But personally I'd like to see them in 2.6.35. These changes allows
us to do more cleanups/improvements.
As for sizeof(int) added to signal_struct. I still hope we can kill
this "int nr_threads" later. Even if not, with these changes we can
move, say, ->group_leader from task_struct to signal_struct and kill
signal->leader_pid.
Oleg.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -mm 0/2] misc: don't use sig->count
2010-05-21 10:08 ` David Howells
2010-05-21 13:35 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-21 15:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
@ 2010-05-24 14:28 ` David Howells
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2010-05-24 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: dhowells, Oleg Nesterov, Peter Zijlstra, Roland McGrath,
linux-kernel
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Sure, unless there's a reason not to do this?
Not that I know of. I was just checking (I'd like to get them out of my patch
stack one way or another).
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-24 14:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-23 14:48 [PATCH -mm 0/2] misc: don't use sig->count Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-21 10:08 ` David Howells
2010-05-21 13:35 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-21 15:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-24 14:28 ` David Howells
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).