From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: DMAR:[fault reason 02] Present bit in context entry is clear (firewire-ohci)
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 06:12:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100522121212.GQ10452@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF7B147.9020502@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:26:15PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I came across a report of the subject message. What does it mean; what
> type of bug should be look for?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587178
> >>>
> firewire_ohci 0000:04:00.4: PCI INT C -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> firewire_ohci 0000:04:00.4: setting latency timer to 64
> firewire_ohci: Added fw-ohci device 0000:04:00.4, OHCI version 1.0
> DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
> DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [04:00.0] fault addr fffff000
> DMAR:[fault reason 02] Present bit in context entry is clear
> DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [04:00.0] fault addr fffff000
> DMAR:[fault reason 02] Present bit in context entry is clear
> DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [04:00.0] fault addr fffff000
> DMAR:[fault reason 02] Present bit in context entry is clear
> <<<
>
> The log sounds as if this happens during from-device DMA of 04:00.4 into
> a consistent buffer, yet the fault is logged for device 04:00.0. The
> log is from a Dell M4500. The devices are, according to a web search,
> 04:00.0 CardBus bridge [0607]: Ricoh Co Ltd Device [1180:e476] (rev 02)
> 04:00.4 FireWire (IEEE 1394) [0c00]: Ricoh Co Ltd Device [1180:e832]
> (rev 03) (prog-if 10)
I would guess that the DMAR can't distinguish between the different
devices behind the Cardbus bridge. Adding Dave Woodhouse.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-22 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-22 10:26 DMAR:[fault reason 02] Present bit in context entry is clear (firewire-ohci) Stefan Richter
2010-05-22 12:12 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2010-05-22 18:40 ` David Woodhouse
2010-05-22 19:09 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-05-30 14:18 ` Stefan Richter
2011-11-19 17:21 ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-30 16:16 ` Clemens Ladisch
2011-12-01 9:14 ` Tomáš Janoušek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100522121212.GQ10452@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox