From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 12:20:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100523102024.GA20869@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF8F46A.1060407@kernel.org>
* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 05/23/2010 11:13 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > ... which is then used for the concurrency-managed
> > workqueue feature, which is then used for a BTRFS
> > speedup, right?
> >
> > ( If that's not the plan then color me confused :)
>
> Yeap, you're officially confused. :-) It doesn't have
> much to do with btrfs at this point [...]
Not exclusive to btrfs of course, but IIRC one of the
examples given in one of those threads was btrfs
scalability, right?
In case it's not obvious, i'm trying to find a tangible
improvement to examine. No need to resend stuff, do you
have a link to that old performance measurement by any
chance?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-23 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-13 10:48 [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: consult online mask instead of active in select_fallback_rq() Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 9:48 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: implement __set_cpus_allowed() Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 9:55 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:06 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:19 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 11:47 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2010-05-13 10:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: add hooks for workqueue Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 9:58 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-31 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-31 10:07 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-17 23:13 ` [PATCHSET sched/core] sched: prepare for cmwq Tejun Heo
2010-05-21 13:25 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-23 9:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-23 9:08 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-23 9:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-05-23 9:24 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-23 10:20 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-05-23 10:26 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-27 8:26 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100523102024.GA20869@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).