From: Markus <M4rkusXXL@web.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:54:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201005251654.09288.M4rkusXXL@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100525143120.GA18018@kryptos.osrc.amd.com>
Hi.
I already thought "swapper" to be unrelated to "swap", but who knows.
The linked article is pretty old, isnt it? I used mdadm to create the
raid1 and "echo check > /sys/block/mdX/md/sync_action" to regulary start
the check.
Its exactly the same kernel as before (the one crashing); Still the
gentoo-kernel (vanilla+fbcondecor).
I will send a mail if anything happens.
Thanks for your time,
Markus
> From: Markus <M4rkusXXL@web.de>
> Date: Tue, May 25, 2010 at 03:09:39PM +0200
>
> > Had disabled swap (saw the string "swapper" and "page_fault"...)
> > and now the problem does not show up anymore.
>
> No, swapper is the idle task and I don't think it has anything to do
> with the oops - it simply happens to be the currently running process
> when the oops happens. And the kernel should be handling swapless
> configurations just fine for the cost of slowing down when RAM is
> depleted or OOM killing a memory hog.
>
> > Dont know, if its now "fixed", but is it possible that raid1 and
> > swap on top does not really work? Normal system usage
> > (auto-detected raid1, add swap by fstab, regularly running a check
> > and perhaps a resync).
>
> Enabling swap on raid1 might need a bit more work, see here:
> http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/5898
>
> Anyways, let me know what happens and especially if it appears again.
> Now you say it doesn't happen anymore but le me ask: is this still
> the gentoo kernel or is it a vanilla one?
>
> Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-25 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-23 16:29 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Markus
2010-05-23 18:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-05-23 20:44 ` Markus
2010-05-23 21:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-05-23 21:48 ` Markus
2010-05-24 11:44 ` Markus
2010-05-25 13:09 ` Markus
2010-05-25 14:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-05-25 14:54 ` Markus [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-27 9:16 Anca Emanuel
2011-03-27 15:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-27 16:00 ` Américo Wang
2011-03-27 17:44 ` Anca Emanuel
2011-03-27 17:52 ` Stephen Wilson
2010-05-31 1:24 Thomas Fjellstrom
2008-05-05 22:33 thomas
2008-05-07 6:55 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201005251654.09288.M4rkusXXL@web.de \
--to=m4rkusxxl@web.de \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox