From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933032Ab0EYRDZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2010 13:03:25 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:37525 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932724Ab0EYRDX (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2010 13:03:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 09:58:26 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, stable-review@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ext4 Developers List , Theodore Tso , "Jayson R. King" , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: Re: [10/24] vfs: Add no_nrwrite_index_update writeback control flag Message-ID: <20100525165825.GB9154@suse.de> References: <20100524223544.GA13721@kroah.com> <20100524223016.208581966@clark.site> <20100525111208.GA8779@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100525111208.GA8779@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 07:12:08AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 03:28:06PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > 2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > NACK. This has been shown to cause severe writeback regression for > other filesystems and is beeing reverted in mianline. Ok, I've dropped this one, and the two ext4 patches after this one as well. If someone wants them back, please feel free to redo them so that they apply to the .27 tree now. thanks, greg k-h