From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755083Ab0EZNjy (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 26 May 2010 09:39:54 -0400
Received: from ist.d-labs.de ([213.239.218.44]:34500 "EHLO mx01.d-labs.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753888Ab0EZNjx (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 26 May 2010 09:39:53 -0400
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 15:39:48 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>,
       Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       "Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org" <Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org>,
       Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
       Linux PM <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
Message-ID: <20100526153948.49fc03d1@schatten.dmk.lab>
In-Reply-To: <20100526141942.2a6b94ff@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
References: <1274863655.5882.4875.camel@twins>
	<AANLkTinN6MKvCEhPkbYQRD2gu-mGXdNW9asRsTuKN3_Y@mail.gmail.com>
	<1274867106.5882.5090.camel@twins>
	<20100526120242.5c9b73ad@schatten.dmk.lab>
	<AANLkTim4021cTnhVZrQpefq1MG-eEPOFLDRO-XDepHb4@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100526133721.602633b2@schatten.dmk.lab>
	<AANLkTikzgaOFdQKess4E-D86OLPOzxP3dWiDkU_UR0ri@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100526142430.327ccbc4@schatten.dmk.lab>
	<20100526122932.GB1990@nokia.com>
	<20100526143323.7c6f8705@schatten.dmk.lab>
	<20100526123532.GA2629@nokia.com>
	<20100526145452.685337db@schatten.dmk.lab>
	<20100526141942.2a6b94ff@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.18.9; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 26 May 2010 14:19:42 +0100
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:


> > This is a _big_ plus for attracting 3rd party programs. (And of course
> > the thing you don't like). 
> 
> You would do better to concentrate on technical issues that the
> assignment of malicious intent to other parties.
> 
> Alan

This was nothing the kind of! He explicitly said this:

On Wed, 26 May 2010 15:29:32 +0300
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@nokia.com> wrote:

> What I find ridiculous is the assumption that kernel should provide good 
> power management even for badly written applications. They should work, 
> of course, but there's no assumption that the kernel should cope with 
> those applications and provide good battery usage on those cases.

And I responded that if the kernel would do this, then that would
be a "_big_ plus for attracting 3d party programs". 

I had no intent in attacking anyone or putting word's in someones mouth.
Sorry if this was unclearly written.

Cheers,
Flo