* [PATCH] virtio-blk: fix minimum number of S/G elements
@ 2010-05-25 12:17 Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-26 8:03 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2010-05-25 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rusty; +Cc: linux-kernel
We need at least one S/G element to operate properly, as does the block
layer which increments it to one anyway. We hit this due to a qemu
bug which advertises a sg_elements of 0 under some circumstances.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c 2010-05-25 13:21:44.136254435 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c 2010-05-25 13:59:04.334005727 +0200
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int __devinit virtblk_probe(struc
struct request_queue *q;
int err;
u64 cap;
- u32 v, blk_size, sg_elems, opt_io_size;
+ u32 v, blk_size, sg_elems = 0, opt_io_size;
u16 min_io_size;
u8 physical_block_exp, alignment_offset;
@@ -298,7 +298,9 @@ static int __devinit virtblk_probe(struc
err = virtio_config_val(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX,
offsetof(struct virtio_blk_config, seg_max),
&sg_elems);
- if (err)
+
+ /* We need at least one SG element */
+ if (!sg_elems)
sg_elems = 1;
/* We need an extra sg elements at head and tail. */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: fix minimum number of S/G elements
2010-05-25 12:17 [PATCH] virtio-blk: fix minimum number of S/G elements Christoph Hellwig
@ 2010-05-26 8:03 ` Rusty Russell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2010-05-26 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Tue, 25 May 2010 09:47:54 pm Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> We need at least one S/G element to operate properly, as does the block
> layer which increments it to one anyway. We hit this due to a qemu
> bug which advertises a sg_elements of 0 under some circumstances.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Seems reasonable: we might as well ignore it if device is obviously talking
crap.
However, the result is awkward (we assign err then don't use it), and assumes
that sg_elems isn't touched on error (true at the moment).
Prefer this:
Subject: virtio-blk: fix minimum number of S/G elements
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 14:17:54 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
We need at least one S/G element to operate properly, as does the block
layer which increments it to one anyway. We hit this due to a qemu
bug which advertises a sg_elements of 0 under some circumstances.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (tweaked logic)
diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -298,7 +298,9 @@ static int __devinit virtblk_probe(struc
err = virtio_config_val(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX,
offsetof(struct virtio_blk_config, seg_max),
&sg_elems);
- if (err)
+
+ /* We need at least one SG element, whatever they say. */
+ if (err || !sg_elems)
sg_elems = 1;
/* We need an extra sg elements at head and tail. */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-26 8:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-25 12:17 [PATCH] virtio-blk: fix minimum number of S/G elements Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-26 8:03 ` Rusty Russell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox