From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933102Ab0E0R5c (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 13:57:32 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:45429 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932966Ab0E0R5b (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 13:57:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 18:57:19 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Alan Stern , Thomas Gleixner , Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, LKML , Florian Mickler , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Message-ID: <20100527175719.GD3543@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1274982779.27810.5708.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1274982779.27810.5708.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:52:59PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Shall we henceforth stop confusing forced suspend for laptops and > powersaving a running system? If you want to support forced suspend for laptops and you want to avoid the risk of losing wakeups then you need in-kernel suspend blockers. That's entirely orthogonal to Android's runtime power management. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org