From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934775Ab0E0SRZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 14:17:25 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:41734 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932501Ab0E0SRY (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 14:17:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:17:12 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Alan Stern , Peter Zijlstra , Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, LKML , Florian Mickler , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Message-ID: <20100527181712.GI3543@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20100527173118.GE2468@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:05:39PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > You're just not getting it. If user space has consumed the event is > not relevant at all. > > What's relevant is whether the app has processed the event and reacted > accordingly. That's all that matters. And how do you know that? We can't rely on the process scheduler. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org