From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752043Ab0E0T3o (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 15:29:44 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:56339 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750744Ab0E0T3n (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 15:29:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 20:29:26 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Alan Cox Cc: Arve =?iso-8859-1?B?SGr4bm5lduVn?= , Florian Mickler , Vitaly Wool , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Paul@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Message-ID: <20100527192926.GA6977@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20100527140655.GA28048@srcf.ucam.org> <20100527160543.2228fc17@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100527160714.GB31937@srcf.ucam.org> <20100527174131.18fd1c72@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100527165210.GA1062@srcf.ucam.org> <20100527190204.14546caa@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100527181239.GF3543@srcf.ucam.org> <20100527194840.5bca973f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20100527185658.GA5703@srcf.ucam.org> <20100527202538.7d2d7f3c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100527202538.7d2d7f3c@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:25:38PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > The scheduler can happily do this, the power management will also > recognize STOPPED processes as no impediment to suspend. But wakeup events won't be delivered to STOPped processes, and there's also the race of an application being in the middle of handling a wakeup event when you send it the signal. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org