From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932828Ab0E0Vib (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 17:38:31 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:36002 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757002Ab0E0Vi3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2010 17:38:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 22:38:19 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Alan Stern , Peter Zijlstra , LKML , Florian Mickler , felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux PM , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8) Message-ID: <20100527213819.GB9916@srcf.ucam.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:33:32PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > > The two of you are talking at cross purposes. Thomas is referring to > > idle-based suspend and Matthew is talking about forced suspend. > > Yes, and forced suspend to disk is the same as force suspend to disk, > which has both nothing to do with sensible resource management. It doesn't matter. Current forced suspend to RAM is racy with respect to wakeup events and should be fixed. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org