From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932681Ab0E0VfX (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 27 May 2010 17:35:23 -0400
Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:50025 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755400Ab0E0VfV (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 27 May 2010 17:35:21 -0400
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 0/8] Suspend block api (version 8)
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 23:36:26 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.34-rjw; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
       Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>,
       Linux PM <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
       Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
       felipe.balbi@nokia.com, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1005271329460.3239-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org> <1274981871.27810.5650.camel@twins>
In-Reply-To: <1274981871.27810.5650.camel@twins>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201005272336.26643.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thursday 27 May 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 13:32 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> 
> > On some platforms (like those with ACPI), deeper power-savings are
> > available by using forced suspend than by using idle. 
> 
> Sounds like something that's fixable, doesn't it?

The fix would probably have to involve rewriting the ACPI spec.

Rafael