From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brandon Philips <brandon@ifup.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@jonmasters.org>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 23:57:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201005272357.28141.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201005271456.20003.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
On Thursday 27 May 2010, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2010 08:26:25 am Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 May 2010, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > I suspect that the increased parallelism enabled by this patch uncovered this
> > > bug. Does this fix it?
> >
> > Since the commit has been reverted, do you still want me to test this patch?
> > Quite frankly I'd prefer to test a complete replacement for that commit on top
> > of current -git.
>
> OK, combo meal deal below, against Linus' latest. I'd really appreciate
> a report, since AFAIK you're the only one hitting it, and only when that
> other (now reverted) patch was applied.
I cannot reproduce the crash with the patch below.
Thanks,
Rafael
> As an side to Brandon: I can see how my patch fixed an explicit request_module
> inside module_init (that's how I tested it). I can't see how we have a
> problem with an implicit dependency such as bne2x->crc32. Modules go into
> the live state without retaking the lock. If you can still reproduce that
> now Linus has reverted, I'm afraid we need to dig deeper...
>
> Thanks,
> Rusty.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> --- a/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -563,33 +563,26 @@ int use_module(struct module *a, struct
> struct module_use *use;
> int no_warn, err;
>
> - if (b == NULL || already_uses(a, b)) return 1;
> + if (b == NULL || already_uses(a, b))
> + return 0;
>
> /* If we're interrupted or time out, we fail. */
> - if (wait_event_interruptible_timeout(
> - module_wq, (err = strong_try_module_get(b)) != -EBUSY,
> - 30 * HZ) <= 0) {
> - printk("%s: gave up waiting for init of module %s.\n",
> - a->name, b->name);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - /* If strong_try_module_get() returned a different error, we fail. */
> + err = strong_try_module_get(b);
> if (err)
> - return 0;
> + return err;
>
> DEBUGP("Allocating new usage for %s.\n", a->name);
> use = kmalloc(sizeof(*use), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!use) {
> printk("%s: out of memory loading\n", a->name);
> module_put(b);
> - return 0;
> + return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> use->module_which_uses = a;
> list_add(&use->list, &b->modules_which_use_me);
> no_warn = sysfs_create_link(b->holders_dir, &a->mkobj.kobj, a->name);
> - return 1;
> + return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(use_module);
>
> @@ -882,7 +875,7 @@ static inline void module_unload_free(st
>
> int use_module(struct module *a, struct module *b)
> {
> - return strong_try_module_get(b) == 0;
> + return strong_try_module_get(b);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(use_module);
>
> @@ -1053,17 +1046,39 @@ static const struct kernel_symbol *resol
> struct module *owner;
> const struct kernel_symbol *sym;
> const unsigned long *crc;
> -
> + DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> + int err;
> + long timeleft = 30 * HZ;
> +
> +again:
> sym = find_symbol(name, &owner, &crc,
> !(mod->taints & (1 << TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE)), true);
> - /* use_module can fail due to OOM,
> - or module initialization or unloading */
> - if (sym) {
> - if (!check_version(sechdrs, versindex, name, mod, crc, owner)
> - || !use_module(mod, owner))
> - sym = NULL;
> + if (!sym)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (!check_version(sechdrs, versindex, name, mod, crc, owner))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + prepare_to_wait(&module_wq, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> + err = use_module(mod, owner);
> + if (likely(!err) || err != -EBUSY || signal_pending(current)) {
> + finish_wait(&module_wq, &wait);
> + return err ? NULL : sym;
> }
> - return sym;
> +
> + /* Module is still loading. Drop lock and wait. */
> + mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
> + timeleft = schedule_timeout(timeleft);
> + mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
> + finish_wait(&module_wq, &wait);
> +
> + /* Module might be gone entirely, or replaced. Re-lookup. */
> + if (timeleft)
> + goto again;
> +
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: gave up waiting for init of module %s.\n",
> + mod->name, owner->name);
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2014,6 +2029,7 @@ static noinline struct module *load_modu
> long err = 0;
> void *ptr = NULL; /* Stops spurious gcc warning */
> unsigned long symoffs, stroffs, *strmap;
> + void __percpu *percpu;
>
> mm_segment_t old_fs;
>
> @@ -2158,6 +2174,8 @@ static noinline struct module *load_modu
> goto free_mod;
> sechdrs[pcpuindex].sh_flags &= ~(unsigned long)SHF_ALLOC;
> }
> + /* Keep this around for failure path. */
> + percpu = mod_percpu(mod);
>
> /* Determine total sizes, and put offsets in sh_entsize. For now
> this is done generically; there doesn't appear to be any
> @@ -2463,7 +2481,7 @@ static noinline struct module *load_modu
> module_free(mod, mod->module_core);
> /* mod will be freed with core. Don't access it beyond this line! */
> free_percpu:
> - percpu_modfree(mod);
> + free_percpu(percpu);
> free_mod:
> kfree(args);
> kfree(strmap);
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-25 21:00 [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-25 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-25 23:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-26 8:00 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-26 11:57 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-26 22:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-26 23:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-27 5:26 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-27 18:46 ` Brandon Philips
2010-05-31 9:40 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] kernel/module.c locking changes Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] module: make locking more fine-grained Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] module: fix bne2 "gave up waiting for init of module libcrc32c" Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 16:48 ` Andrew Morton
2010-05-31 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-31 20:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-31 20:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way Linus Torvalds
2010-05-31 20:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] module: wait for other modules after dropping the module_mutex Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 1:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] Make the module 'usage' lists be two-way Rusty Russell
2010-06-01 3:42 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01 4:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 4:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 2:44 ` Américo Wang
2010-06-01 3:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 1:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] module: fix bne2 "gave up waiting for init of module libcrc32c" Rusty Russell
2010-06-01 3:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 4:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 5:19 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 3:15 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01 1:21 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01 3:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 5:22 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01 14:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 17:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 23:24 ` Brandon Philips
2010-06-01 23:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 2:10 ` Brandon Philips
2010-06-02 3:03 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 4:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 4:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 6:35 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 7:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 8:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 9:07 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 5:52 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 7:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 14:06 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 14:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03 13:06 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 16:53 ` Brandon Philips
2010-06-02 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-03 5:20 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-03 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-04 1:02 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-04 1:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-04 5:20 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-04 22:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-05 1:49 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 3:09 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 4:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 4:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-02 5:52 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-02 6:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-01 1:04 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-01 5:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] module: make locking more fine-grained Américo Wang
2010-06-01 5:55 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-27 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-05-31 7:54 ` [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 10:23 ` [PATCH] module: fix reference to mod->percpu after freeing module Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 10:25 ` Tejun Heo
2010-05-26 15:41 ` [Regression] Crash in load_module() while freeing args Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201005272357.28141.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brandon@ifup.org \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathan@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox