From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754770Ab0E1HJY (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2010 03:09:24 -0400 Received: from 8bytes.org ([88.198.83.132]:40853 "EHLO 8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754121Ab0E1HJW (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2010 03:09:22 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 319 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 28 May 2010 03:09:22 EDT Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 09:09:21 +0200 From: Joerg Roedel To: Nicolas Palix Cc: Randy Dunlap , Roland Dreier , Joe Perches , Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , Michal Marek , Sam Ravnborg , Julia Lawall , Gilles Muller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, cocci@diku.dk, Wolfram Sang , Kernel Janitors Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add a Coccinelle front-end script Message-ID: <20100528070921.GK1237@8bytes.org> References: <1273508667-5152-1-git-send-email-npalix@diku.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1273508667-5152-1-git-send-email-npalix@diku.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 06:24:23PM +0200, Nicolas Palix wrote: > Three semantic patches, with a low rate of false positives, are also > included. Is there a way to annotate false positives so that they do not produce warnings over and over? > Other semantic patches will be provided later. Note that a semantic > patch does not need to define all four modes. As many semantic patches > may be proposed later, they are organized under sub-directories of > 'scripts/coccinelle/'. Don't know how complex the coccinelle software itself is, but I think it would make sense to ship it with the kernel-sources too. That together with a README and everything is perfect :-) Thanks for the great work, this should definitly be upstream. Joerg