From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
wezhang@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
William Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] remove the bogus checks in sys_personality()->__set_personality() path
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 21:12:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100528191231.GD12090@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100528191139.GB12090@redhat.com>
Cleanup, no functional changes.
- __set_personality() always changes ->exec_domain/personality, the
special case when ->exec_domain remains the same buys nothing but
complicates the code. Unify both cases to simplify the code.
- The -EINVAL check in sys_personality() was never right. If we assume
that set_personality() can fail we should check the value it returns
instead of verifying that task->personality was actually changed.
Remove it. Before the previous patch it was possible to hit this case
due to overflow problems, but this -EINVAL just indicated the kernel
bug.
OTOH, probably it makes sense to change lookup_exec_domain() to return
ERR_PTR() instead of default_exec_domain if the search in exec_domains
list fails, and report this error to the user-space. But this means
another user-space change, and we have in-kernel users which need fixes.
For example, PER_OSF4 falls into PER_MASK for unkown reason and nobody
cares to register this domain.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/exec_domain.c | 22 +++++-----------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--- 34-rc1/kernel/exec_domain.c~2_CLEANUP 2010-05-28 18:23:25.000000000 +0200
+++ 34-rc1/kernel/exec_domain.c 2010-05-28 20:07:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -134,23 +134,14 @@ unregister:
return 0;
}
-int
-__set_personality(unsigned int personality)
+int __set_personality(unsigned int personality)
{
- struct exec_domain *ep, *oep;
-
- ep = lookup_exec_domain(personality);
- if (ep == current_thread_info()->exec_domain) {
- current->personality = personality;
- module_put(ep->module);
- return 0;
- }
+ struct exec_domain *oep = current_thread_info()->exec_domain;
+ current_thread_info()->exec_domain = lookup_exec_domain(personality);
current->personality = personality;
- oep = current_thread_info()->exec_domain;
- current_thread_info()->exec_domain = ep;
-
module_put(oep->module);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -192,11 +183,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(personality, unsigned in
{
unsigned int old = current->personality;
- if (personality != 0xffffffff) {
+ if (personality != 0xffffffff)
set_personality(personality);
- if (current->personality != personality)
- return -EINVAL;
- }
return old;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-28 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-25 14:17 Q: sys_personality() && misc oddities Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-25 19:33 ` Roland McGrath
2010-05-26 12:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-26 20:31 ` Roland McGrath
2010-05-26 20:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-27 15:35 ` [PATCH 0/3] (Was: Q: sys_personality() && misc oddities) Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-27 15:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] sys_personality: validate personality before set_personality() Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-27 16:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-27 17:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-27 17:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-27 18:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-27 18:18 ` Andi Kleen
2010-05-28 19:11 ` [PATCH 0/2] sys_personality fixes v2 Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-28 19:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] change sys_personality() to accept "unsigned int" instead of u_long Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-28 19:12 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-05-28 19:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] sys_personality fixes v2 Linus Torvalds
2010-05-28 19:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-28 19:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-27 15:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] sys_personality: make sure (int)personality >= 0 Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-27 20:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-05-28 19:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-05-27 15:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] __set_personality: no need to check the old ->exec_domain Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100528191231.GD12090@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
--cc=wezhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).