From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753450Ab0EaVIO (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2010 17:08:14 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f216.google.com ([209.85.219.216]:49130 "EHLO mail-ew0-f216.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752968Ab0EaVIM (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2010 17:08:12 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=ZTVyN6UzF1tf+4Rt1OzDJrHZYuET0gX9OdjLP1W5Kk6KUTWckJojBC2skDgvSmshzH epx5klL7MgOpECyAAbbZCJZ9g1Wam7F/vrOwNx1kK2voicwYpj3J8FSC5mtKA8gAE473 bJkkIGc8/r27pMEzy4j6RVWh+eCegf0fR6UIY= Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 23:07:48 +0200 From: Dan Carpenter To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Todd Fischer , Samuel Ortiz , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] input/tps6507x-ts: zero vs NULL Message-ID: <20100531210748.GB5483@bicker> Mail-Followup-To: Dan Carpenter , Dmitry Torokhov , Todd Fischer , Samuel Ortiz , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org References: <20100531120215.GS5483@bicker> <20100531191029.GD30712@core.coreip.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100531191029.GD30712@core.coreip.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:10:29PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:02:15PM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/tps6507x-ts.c > > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/tps6507x-ts.c > > @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ err2: > > cancel_delayed_work(&tsc->work); > > flush_workqueue(tsc->wq); > > destroy_workqueue(tsc->wq); > > - tsc->wq = 0; > > + tsc->wq = NULL; > > input_free_device(input_dev); > > err1: > > kfree(tsc); > > @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static int __devexit tps6507x_ts_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > cancel_delayed_work(&tsc->work); > > flush_workqueue(tsc->wq); > > Why isn't it cancel_delayed_work_sync()? > Good point. > > destroy_workqueue(tsc->wq); > > - tsc->wq = 0; > > + tsc->wq = NULL; > > > > Setting tsc to 0/NULL does not make much sense as it is being freed a > couple of lines below. > That's true. I'll send an updated patch tomorrow. regards, dan carpenter