From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757355Ab0FAV0E (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 17:26:04 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]:52724 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756637Ab0FAV0A (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2010 17:26:00 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ttaMHwFggvgUYE/F2yG6YU0LunfL/6BAHrlfZblunZbglQuBerpxN2+zlRfQTnodD2 ZzWsz56kVpnbbaV3QmoBlinGk6GDaGhVuwyW+7r+hOQmppw0+jQFdIldsakHNRESsOh/ Wly/Bnp9kkNmos0mCAb2iU/2+96/J8Y05u9Tk= Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:25:56 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Peter Zijlstra , Robert Richter Cc: Ingo Molnar , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , LKML , Stephane Eranian Subject: Re: [RFC] perf, x86: Segregate PMU workaraunds into x86_pmu_quirk_ops structure Message-ID: <20100601212556.GD14072@lenovo> References: <20100529182409.GJ5322@lenovo> <1275157990.1645.519.camel@laptop> <20100531164553.GD5489@lenovo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100531164553.GD5489@lenovo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:45:53PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: ... > > So I guess plain test may be more-less fine here, hmm? > > -- Cyrill > --- > perf, x86: Make a second write to performance counter when needed > > On Netburst cpu we need a second write to performance counter to > be sure it's updated properly. > > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 10 ++++++++++ > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 9 +++++++++ > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) > ... Ping? Any objections/ideas on this approach? -- Cyrill