From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758835Ab0FBXbG (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 19:31:06 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:49747 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754989Ab0FBXbE (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 19:31:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:10:29 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , Frederic Weisbecker , John Kacur Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] tty: BKL removal Message-ID: <20100602231029.GA12238@suse.de> References: <1275425591-8803-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <201006030016.44621.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201006030016.44621.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:16:44AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 01 June 2010 22:52:40 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > As promised, here is a resend of the patches from > > both Alan and myself, making the BKL optional > > in the TTY layer. Please apply to your tty-next > > tree. > > FWIW, I've documented what I've learned about the BKL (now BTM) > locking in the tty code, see > http://kernelnewbies.org/BigKernelLock?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=tty_lock.png > > I hope that helps in the process of killing the BTM itself. Very cool, thanks for documenting this. I'll queue up your patches in a few days. greg k-h