Re: [PATCH 0/8] revised patch for arch/tile/ support

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>]

On Saturday 29 May 2010 13:29:10 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 29 May 2010, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks to some much-appreciated volunteer work reviewing that initial
> > patch, I now have a revised set of patches which I would like to offer
> > for submission to the mainline.
> 
> It seems that you have addressed all my review comments and all the
> other comments that I have seen in the best possible ways.
> All the controversial parts from the original code are either corrected
> or (in case of nonessential drivers) deferred to a future review.
> I did not expect this to be possibly in such a short time, and it
> continues to amaze me.
> 
> Consequently, I fully support this series to go into 2.6.35.
> To the entire series:
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Hi Chris,

You evidently didn't make it into -rc1, probably because Linus considered
your submission to be too late, or possibly because some of the bigger
patches got lost in an email filter.

To go forward with your architecture, I suggest that you start adding it
to the linux-next tree. Until you have a git tree, the easiest way
to do that is to put a tarball in quilt format at a http url under
your control, and ask Stephen to include that.

Feel free to add a 'Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>' to your
existing patches, and do your further work as patches on top of that.

	Arnd