From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755521Ab0FCUlB (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:41:01 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:59433 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754424Ab0FCUk7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 16:40:59 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Chris Metcalf Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] revised patch for arch/tile/ support Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:40:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.35-rc1-00090-g358f4b6; KDE/4.4.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Stephen Rothwell References: <201005200543.o4K5hFRF006079@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> <201005290333.o4T3Xjse029917@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> <201005291329.10941.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <201005291329.10941.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201006032240.31963.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+wM7a2DjiVRp9qUGNUoAEDXlAHF8HxUchxG4F /tHhI+r3Z0Vx0O6C/IbbGzJlNVmn+5cZRzWEQEW7CEj+3DvMFr dEUOlL5r0DTmFZPqZjdeg== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 29 May 2010 13:29:10 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 29 May 2010, Chris Metcalf wrote: > > > > Thanks to some much-appreciated volunteer work reviewing that initial > > patch, I now have a revised set of patches which I would like to offer > > for submission to the mainline. > > It seems that you have addressed all my review comments and all the > other comments that I have seen in the best possible ways. > All the controversial parts from the original code are either corrected > or (in case of nonessential drivers) deferred to a future review. > I did not expect this to be possibly in such a short time, and it > continues to amaze me. > > Consequently, I fully support this series to go into 2.6.35. > To the entire series: > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Hi Chris, You evidently didn't make it into -rc1, probably because Linus considered your submission to be too late, or possibly because some of the bigger patches got lost in an email filter. To go forward with your architecture, I suggest that you start adding it to the linux-next tree. Until you have a git tree, the easiest way to do that is to put a tarball in quilt format at a http url under your control, and ask Stephen to include that. Feel free to add a 'Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann ' to your existing patches, and do your further work as patches on top of that. Arnd