From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
Cc: <mingo@elte.hu>, <simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net>,
<David.Woodhouse@intel.com>, <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] printk: fix delayed messages from CPU hotplug events
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:58:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100603225824.8de77fba.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee1bf4f9c158983acad0a4548229586128afad67@localhost>
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 22:11:25 -0700 Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Changes from v2:
>
> Use hotcpu_notifier - fix will only apply to hotplug events, not
> initial SMP boot
>
> Kerneldocify function arguments
>
> Use acquire_console_sem() instead of try_acquire_console_sem()
>
> Reuse the existing disable_boot_consoles() initcall instead of making a
> new one]
>
> When a secondary CPU is being brought up, it is not uncommon for
> printk() to be invoked when cpu_online(smp_processor_id()) == 0. The
> case that I witnessed personally was on MIPS:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/5/30/4
>
> If (can_use_console() == 0), printk() will spool its output to log_buf
> and it will be visible in "dmesg", but that output will NOT be echoed to
> the console until somebody calls release_console_sem() from a CPU that
> is online. Therefore, the boot time messages from the new CPU can get
> stuck in "limbo" for a long time, and might suddenly appear on the
> screen when a completely unrelated event (e.g. "eth0: link is down")
> occurs.
>
> This patch modifies the console code so that any pending messages are
> automatically flushed out to the console whenever a CPU hotplug
> operation completes successfully or aborts.
>
> The issue was seen on 2.6.34.
>
> ...
>
> +static int __cpuinit console_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> + unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +{
> + switch (action) {
> + case CPU_ONLINE:
> + case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
> + acquire_console_sem();
> + release_console_sem();
> + }
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata console_nb = {
> + .notifier_call = console_cpu_notify,
> +};
> +
> +/**
> * acquire_console_sem - lock the console system for exclusive use.
> *
> * Acquires a semaphore which guarantees that the caller has
> @@ -1371,7 +1400,7 @@ int unregister_console(struct console *console)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_console);
>
> -static int __init disable_boot_consoles(void)
> +static int __init printk_late_init(void)
> {
> struct console *con;
>
> @@ -1382,9 +1411,10 @@ static int __init disable_boot_consoles(void)
> unregister_console(con);
> }
> }
> + register_hotcpu_notifier(&console_nb);
gack, we seem to have made these interfaces as hard to use and as documentation-free
as we possibly could :(
This:
--- a/kernel/printk.c~printk-fix-delayed-messages-from-cpu-hotplug-events-fix
+++ a/kernel/printk.c
@@ -1009,10 +1009,6 @@ static int __cpuinit console_cpu_notify(
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
-static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata console_nb = {
- .notifier_call = console_cpu_notify,
-};
-
/**
* acquire_console_sem - lock the console system for exclusive use.
*
@@ -1411,7 +1407,7 @@ static int __init printk_late_init(void)
unregister_console(con);
}
}
- register_hotcpu_notifier(&console_nb);
+ hotcpu_notifier(console_cpu_notify, 0);
return 0;
}
late_initcall(printk_late_init);
There are numerous other register_hotcpu_notifier() callsites which can
probably be converted.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-04 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-04 5:11 [PATCH v3] printk: fix delayed messages from CPU hotplug events Kevin Cernekee
2010-06-04 5:20 ` Paul Mundt
2010-06-04 5:58 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-06-06 1:29 ` Ralf Baechle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100603225824.8de77fba.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=David.Woodhouse@intel.com \
--cc=cernekee@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=simon.kagstrom@netinsight.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox