From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932467Ab0FEUkE (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sat, 5 Jun 2010 16:40:04 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:34903 "EHLO
	mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932163Ab0FEUj7 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 5 Jun 2010 16:39:59 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
         :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
        b=SeM0U3qNyu5Asi/Wtyc3S0F25TWF6MO708jF4ZKbD7CsZMa6orG6I/WXyTg0OuzOg1
         3xG99A0b+1gN97defiqNFE3Sh58L+cxHsQlfNjdJywHppldlON7UHuLFS1WXN0xtpB0v
         9of3W9lvqMTHxyM71UDCtSpuCB0ZWtSfdRN5w=
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 22:39:55 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux/m68k <linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
       Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zorro: BKL removal
Message-ID: <20100605203954.GD5368@nowhere>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1006052121550.12934@ayla.of.borg> <20100605194149.GC5368@nowhere> <AANLkTimy9yNjrOF8QDzQvzo9vzzJuXzs166UYI5wCvFe@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimy9yNjrOF8QDzQvzo9vzzJuXzs166UYI5wCvFe@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 10:03:33PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 21:41, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 09:23:01PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Remove BKL use from proc_bus_zorro_lseek(), like was done for
> >> proc_bus_pci_lseek() a long time ago.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> >> ---
> > Cool.
> >
> > I suspect you'll queue it in your tree? Or should I?
> 
> I'll queue it for 2.6.36.
> 
> But I don't mind you to take it if you want to do something earlier...


It's ok you can take it. I prefer that maintainers take these
bkl works when possible, as they better know the code.