public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc2 module reference counting broken
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 07:44:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100607064412.GK31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C0C819E.EA5D6A18@users.sourceforge.net>

On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 08:20:30AM +0300, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> Someone broke block device module reference counting. Problem occours when a
> modular block device is mounted and unmounted. Not when it is directly read.
> 2.6.34 kernel works OK, but 2.6.35-rc2 kernel seems to increase usage count
> by one for each mount + umount pair.

Very interesting...  Looks like mount() bumps refcount by 2.  umount() after
that drops refcount by 1, so it's not leaking superblocks.

Which probably means that open_bdev_exclusive() is fscked.  Interesting...
FWIW, quick look through the history seems to point to this:
commit 6b4517a7913a09d3259bb1d21c9cb300f12294bd
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed Apr 7 18:53:59 2010 +0900

    block: implement bd_claiming and claiming block

I'm far too sleepy right now, but I'd start with reviewing what that
thing is doing to module refcounting...

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-07  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-07  5:20 2.6.35-rc2 module reference counting broken Jari Ruusu
2010-06-07  6:44 ` Al Viro [this message]
2010-06-08 23:48   ` Al Viro
2010-06-09  7:01     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-10  6:34       ` Jari Ruusu
2010-06-10 11:31         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100607064412.GK31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox