From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pedro Ribeiro <pedrib@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"TuxOnIce-devel" <tuxonice-devel@tuxonice.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Proposal for a new algorithm for reading & writing a hibernation image.
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 10:41:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201006071041.49159.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim9CNFMMVQaghrzK3JnQlGmTewgarT01HP6cEtd@mail.gmail.com>
On Sunday 06 June 2010, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
> On 6 June 2010 20:04, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Sunday 06 June 2010, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
...
> > So what about being able to save 1600 MB total instead of the 2 GB
> > (which is what we're talking about in case that's not clear)? Would it
> > be _that_ _much_ worse?
>
> No it wouldn't be much worse. But there will still be some lagginess,
> some delay, some sort of annoying disk activity compared to NO delay,
> NO lagginess, in short, you have your computer _exactly_ the way you
> left it when you left it when you hibernated. And the difference is
> noticeable.
Well, have you actually tried that?
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-07 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-03 14:50 [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [linux-pm] Proposal for a new algorithm for reading & writing a hibernation image Pavel Machek
2010-06-04 23:39 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-04 23:58 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 0:36 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-05 0:45 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-05 3:37 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 0:47 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 1:16 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-05 3:17 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 0:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 12:59 ` [TuxOnIce-devel] " Theodore Tso
2010-06-05 23:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 0:20 ` [linux-pm] [SUSPECTED SPAM] " Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 18:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-05 19:10 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-05 19:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-05 22:54 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-05 23:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-06 7:01 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-06 14:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-07 5:23 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-07 8:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-06 0:40 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-06 13:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-06 15:54 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-06 19:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-06 19:51 ` Maxim Levitsky
2010-06-06 21:55 ` Pedro Ribeiro
2010-06-07 8:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-06-07 5:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-07 8:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-08 2:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-08 9:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-07 13:07 ` [TuxOnIce-devel] " Martin Steigerwald
2010-06-07 21:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-07 21:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-06-07 5:28 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201006071041.49159.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
--cc=pedrib@gmail.com \
--cc=tuxonice-devel@tuxonice.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox