From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753273Ab0FHFoz (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 01:44:55 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:38454 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752663Ab0FHFox (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 01:44:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 15:44:46 +1000 From: Nick Piggin To: Dave Chinner Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] writeback: tracing and fixes V4 Message-ID: <20100608054446.GT26335@laptop> References: <1275957487-23633-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1275957487-23633-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 10:38:01AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Hi Linus, > > Can you please consider this patch series for 2.6.35? If you don't > want the tracing at this stage of the release process, I can redo > the series with just the bug fixes. However, given the regularity > with which we break the writeback code in subtle ways, the tracing > is probably just as important as the bug fixes. Oh, I don't have a problem with your EOF fix being merged now, as Jan's patch isn't suitable for 2.6.35.