public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc2 module reference counting broken
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 00:48:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100608234814.GA19826@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100607064412.GK31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 07:44:12AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 08:20:30AM +0300, Jari Ruusu wrote:
> > Someone broke block device module reference counting. Problem occours when a
> > modular block device is mounted and unmounted. Not when it is directly read.
> > 2.6.34 kernel works OK, but 2.6.35-rc2 kernel seems to increase usage count
> > by one for each mount + umount pair.
> 
> Very interesting...  Looks like mount() bumps refcount by 2.  umount() after
> that drops refcount by 1, so it's not leaking superblocks.
> 
> Which probably means that open_bdev_exclusive() is fscked.  Interesting...
> FWIW, quick look through the history seems to point to this:
> commit 6b4517a7913a09d3259bb1d21c9cb300f12294bd
> Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Date:   Wed Apr 7 18:53:59 2010 +0900
> 
>     block: implement bd_claiming and claiming block
> 
> I'm far too sleepy right now, but I'd start with reviewing what that
> thing is doing to module refcounting...

Yeah...  bd_start_claiming() grabs a reference to gendisk and we never
let it go.  There's your leak...

  reply	other threads:[~2010-06-08 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-07  5:20 2.6.35-rc2 module reference counting broken Jari Ruusu
2010-06-07  6:44 ` Al Viro
2010-06-08 23:48   ` Al Viro [this message]
2010-06-09  7:01     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-10  6:34       ` Jari Ruusu
2010-06-10 11:31         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100608234814.GA19826@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox